News Weekly
Wednesday 6/12/2006 Page: 16
The targets are for a 50 per cent reduction in the consumption of energy, and a 50 per cent production from renewable energy resources by the year 2020. Those targets have been adopted by the communities of the Bega Valley and Eurobodalla.
Currently working groups in both shires are looking at how those targets will be met. his is an exciting time for the South Coast of NSW. We can make a big difference to our CO2 emissions, and show others how it can be done.
At the moment, governments on all sides of politics are realising that they have to do something about Australia's reliance on coal. Some interest groups and industry lobbyists are promoting the role that nuclear energy could have in our energy future. They have the support of some political leaders and publicists.
However nuclear energy is definitely not clean and it is not renewable, so it does not even make the list of possible clean energy sources. Despite this fact it seems that this is a debate that we must have.
We look forward to a similar high profile debate about the role of clean, renewable energy. In fact, our main purpose is to make sure that this clean energy debate happens, so that voters can be fully informed at election time.
Decisions on how we can reach clean energy targets are much more important than a sideshow debate on nuclear power, which is already an old, lost cause.
There is a huge groundswell of support for renewable energy on the South Coast, and because we want to lead this debate, the strongest statement we can make is to show Australia that renewable energy can work.
`Clean energy for eternity' plans to kick-start the 50/50 by 2020 campaign with a highly visible project, involving our surf clubs. We want to help set up surf clubs on the South Coast to produce all their energy from renewable sources.
A pilot project has been set up for the Tathra Surf Lifesaving Club and the project aims to be up and running before the end of the year. Other surf clubs will be close behind. Renewable energy will allow surf clubs to forget about their electricity bill, enabling them to spend money on much needed equipment.
The Bega Valley Shire has been supportive, and has offered to help fund this project dollar for dollar with community donations. This is where you the reader comes in, but I will talk about this in a second.
Once the South Coast is set up, we plan to announce this project as a national initiative, and have all 304 surf clubs in Australia set up with renewable energy by the end of 2007.
2007 is the year of the lifesaver. The surf club package must include solar hot water, photovoltaic cells and a wind turbine. The wind turbine must have a tail, and that tail must be painted in surf club colours.
Our new web is www.cleanenergyforeternity.com.au
Friday, 8 December 2006
Wind of change
Blue Mountains Gazette
Wednesday 6/12/2006 Page: 1
Push to build community farm in region By Jacqul Knox
Have you ever wanted to own a 70 metre tall wind turbine? If a group of energy campaigners have their way, you might just get the opportunity. Katoomba environmentalist Ian Lett has launched the idea of a multi-million dollar community wind farm for the Blue Mountains and Lithgow.
The farm would pump renewable energy into the electricity grid while also pumping dollars into the accounts of local shareholders. The proposal received strong support from the Blackheath environment group CAKE at a first working party meeting on Sunday.
"I think it's tapping into the fact that the bulk of the community is more interested in renewable than nuclear and they feel they have to take it into their own hands to make it happen," said Lis Bastion, instigator of CAKE.
However the catch is the turbines - often considered noisy and ugly - cannot be built near the world heritage area. Instead, they would be built near Lithgow or Oberon where wind is plentiful and blows uninterrupted by trees or housing.
Mr Lett, a former Lithgow resident, acknowledges that it may be difficult to convince those communities and intends to hold public meeting, "A community-owned wind farm is firstly about community," he said.
Corporate money and government grants would be used to build the turbines, which would be bought back by a local co-operative sharing profits from the electricity generated. Such schemes are relatively widespread in Europe.
But while the prospect of a financial return might sweeten the proposal, a similar concept in Western Australia caused bitter divisions earlier this year.
Closer to home a wind farm proposal in Black Springs, near Oberon, has also had luke-warm reception. Ian is hoping that with better planning and the experience of local councils a Blue Mountains/Lithgow community wind farm could be a model for other districts.
"It will take two or three years before there's a wind turbine producing power," he said. "What we've been doing is gathering support, looking for grants or other funding, and starting to engage the broader community. "What we need to do next is get a mandate from the community (to pursue the project)," he said.
Wednesday 6/12/2006 Page: 1
Push to build community farm in region By Jacqul Knox
Have you ever wanted to own a 70 metre tall wind turbine? If a group of energy campaigners have their way, you might just get the opportunity. Katoomba environmentalist Ian Lett has launched the idea of a multi-million dollar community wind farm for the Blue Mountains and Lithgow.
The farm would pump renewable energy into the electricity grid while also pumping dollars into the accounts of local shareholders. The proposal received strong support from the Blackheath environment group CAKE at a first working party meeting on Sunday.
"I think it's tapping into the fact that the bulk of the community is more interested in renewable than nuclear and they feel they have to take it into their own hands to make it happen," said Lis Bastion, instigator of CAKE.
However the catch is the turbines - often considered noisy and ugly - cannot be built near the world heritage area. Instead, they would be built near Lithgow or Oberon where wind is plentiful and blows uninterrupted by trees or housing.
Mr Lett, a former Lithgow resident, acknowledges that it may be difficult to convince those communities and intends to hold public meeting, "A community-owned wind farm is firstly about community," he said.
Corporate money and government grants would be used to build the turbines, which would be bought back by a local co-operative sharing profits from the electricity generated. Such schemes are relatively widespread in Europe.
But while the prospect of a financial return might sweeten the proposal, a similar concept in Western Australia caused bitter divisions earlier this year.
Closer to home a wind farm proposal in Black Springs, near Oberon, has also had luke-warm reception. Ian is hoping that with better planning and the experience of local councils a Blue Mountains/Lithgow community wind farm could be a model for other districts.
"It will take two or three years before there's a wind turbine producing power," he said. "What we've been doing is gathering support, looking for grants or other funding, and starting to engage the broader community. "What we need to do next is get a mandate from the community (to pursue the project)," he said.
Mt Barker windfarm now a step closer
Albany Advertiser
Thursday 7/12/2006 Page: 4
MT Barker's windfarm is one step closer to approval. The Plantagenet Shire Council has agreed to initiate an amendment to its Town Planning Scheme No.3 to allow it to go ahead.
The amendment will now be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority for clearance, and a period for public comment will follow.
The proposed windfarm will have three turbines and is set to be built just north of Mt Barker on the west side of Albany Highway. The land the windfarm will occupy will be leased from the owner, who will still be able to continue his farming practices.
Shire president Cr Kevin Forbes said the site was well elevated and had good access to southerly winds. The land is already cleared.
Thursday 7/12/2006 Page: 4
MT Barker's windfarm is one step closer to approval. The Plantagenet Shire Council has agreed to initiate an amendment to its Town Planning Scheme No.3 to allow it to go ahead.
The amendment will now be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority for clearance, and a period for public comment will follow.
The proposed windfarm will have three turbines and is set to be built just north of Mt Barker on the west side of Albany Highway. The land the windfarm will occupy will be leased from the owner, who will still be able to continue his farming practices.
Shire president Cr Kevin Forbes said the site was well elevated and had good access to southerly winds. The land is already cleared.
Nuclear wrong fork in road
Sunshine Coast Daily
Friday 8/12/2006 Page: 20
SINCE the initial flurry following the release of Ziggy Switkowski's report on nuclear power last month, the government seems to have fallen silent on the subject.
I don't think for a moment the Prime Minister's commitment to the pursuit of a nuclear future is wavering. It is much more likely that any reticence is an acknowledgment that it's going to be a tough sell in the electorate. The government quickly moved to shut down discussion about the location of nuclear reactors, claiming we should debate the wider concept before getting into the detail.
We know nuclear power plants would need to be built within 100 kilometres of major population centres and close to plentiful water supplies. Based on those criteria, sites on the coastline close to capital cities would appear to be primary targets, but at this stage we can only speculate and draw our own conclusions.
Supporters have called for a sensible, reasoned debate and the Prime Minister has said the country cannot afford to "sacrifice rational discussion on the altar of anti-nuclear theology and political opportunism".
Opponents who have scrutinised the issue beyond general impressions and memories of Chernobyl point to numerous arguments against heading down the yellow-cake road.
Al Gore and Professor Ian Lowe, for example, are both learned, intelligent men disinclined towards hysteria and deeply committed to efforts to tackle global warming yet opposed to nuclear power. During his recent visit to Australia, Mr Gore was sceptical about nuclear power making a significant contribution towards combating climate change.
Mr Gore said in addition to the problem of long-term waste storage, the danger of operator accident and the vulnerability to terrorist attack, there were still two key issues that work against it as a future option.
Firstly there's the economics. "Nuclear power plants are the costliest to build and they take the longest time and at present they come in only one size - extra large," he said.
The second was nuclear weapons proliferation. "For eight years when I was in the White House, every problem of weapons proliferation was connected to a reactor program." In a speech this year, leading environmental scientist Professor Ian Lowe set out a long list of reasons why we should look to renewable options to meet our energy needs and I will do my best to summarise some of his comments.
Firstly, nuclear power is expensive and every dollar poured into the development of a nuclear industry in Australia is a dollar that could have been invested in more economically viable alternatives.
While nuclear power proponents say it has been safely employed around the world for years, Prof Lowe points out that many of those countries are now turning their backs on nuclear energy after spending billions pursuing it. The number of reactors in Western Europe and the USA has been declining over the past 15 years while uptake of wind power and solar energy is increasing rapidly.
Prof Lowe added that climate change required an immediate response and it would be at least 15 years before the first reactor in Australia could deliver any result, while wind turbines could be delivering power within a year.
Despite arguments about nuclear power being a clean, green energy source it is not actually carbon-free. Significant amounts of fossil fuels are required to mine and process uranium ores, enrich the fuel and build nuclear power stations. In addition, high-grade uranium ores are comparatively scarce and, on the best available estimates, known reserves could only supply present demand for 40 or 50 years. Lower-grade ores are more plentiful but require much more conventional energy for extraction and processing, resulting in more greenhouse pollution.
There is the problem of storage of nuclear waste and the fact that nuclear power would potentially make the world more dangerous due to the risk of an accident and the increased risk of nuclear weapons or nuclear terrorism.
"You won't hear people worrying about terrorists getting hold of wind turbine parts, or making dirty bombs out of solar panels," Prof Lowe said.
The Prime Minister has suggested that renewable energy sources could be part of the mix but they would not meet Australia's base-load energy requirements. Prof Lowe doesn't buy it, noting that renewables already account for a quarter of the installed capacity of California, a third of Sweden's energy and three-quarters of Iceland's.
"Renewables can meet Australia's energy demands," he said. "By contrast nuclear power is expensive, slow and dangerous - and it won't stop climate change."
Friday 8/12/2006 Page: 20
SINCE the initial flurry following the release of Ziggy Switkowski's report on nuclear power last month, the government seems to have fallen silent on the subject.
I don't think for a moment the Prime Minister's commitment to the pursuit of a nuclear future is wavering. It is much more likely that any reticence is an acknowledgment that it's going to be a tough sell in the electorate. The government quickly moved to shut down discussion about the location of nuclear reactors, claiming we should debate the wider concept before getting into the detail.
We know nuclear power plants would need to be built within 100 kilometres of major population centres and close to plentiful water supplies. Based on those criteria, sites on the coastline close to capital cities would appear to be primary targets, but at this stage we can only speculate and draw our own conclusions.
Supporters have called for a sensible, reasoned debate and the Prime Minister has said the country cannot afford to "sacrifice rational discussion on the altar of anti-nuclear theology and political opportunism".
Opponents who have scrutinised the issue beyond general impressions and memories of Chernobyl point to numerous arguments against heading down the yellow-cake road.
Al Gore and Professor Ian Lowe, for example, are both learned, intelligent men disinclined towards hysteria and deeply committed to efforts to tackle global warming yet opposed to nuclear power. During his recent visit to Australia, Mr Gore was sceptical about nuclear power making a significant contribution towards combating climate change.
Mr Gore said in addition to the problem of long-term waste storage, the danger of operator accident and the vulnerability to terrorist attack, there were still two key issues that work against it as a future option.
Firstly there's the economics. "Nuclear power plants are the costliest to build and they take the longest time and at present they come in only one size - extra large," he said.
The second was nuclear weapons proliferation. "For eight years when I was in the White House, every problem of weapons proliferation was connected to a reactor program." In a speech this year, leading environmental scientist Professor Ian Lowe set out a long list of reasons why we should look to renewable options to meet our energy needs and I will do my best to summarise some of his comments.
Firstly, nuclear power is expensive and every dollar poured into the development of a nuclear industry in Australia is a dollar that could have been invested in more economically viable alternatives.
While nuclear power proponents say it has been safely employed around the world for years, Prof Lowe points out that many of those countries are now turning their backs on nuclear energy after spending billions pursuing it. The number of reactors in Western Europe and the USA has been declining over the past 15 years while uptake of wind power and solar energy is increasing rapidly.
Prof Lowe added that climate change required an immediate response and it would be at least 15 years before the first reactor in Australia could deliver any result, while wind turbines could be delivering power within a year.
Despite arguments about nuclear power being a clean, green energy source it is not actually carbon-free. Significant amounts of fossil fuels are required to mine and process uranium ores, enrich the fuel and build nuclear power stations. In addition, high-grade uranium ores are comparatively scarce and, on the best available estimates, known reserves could only supply present demand for 40 or 50 years. Lower-grade ores are more plentiful but require much more conventional energy for extraction and processing, resulting in more greenhouse pollution.
There is the problem of storage of nuclear waste and the fact that nuclear power would potentially make the world more dangerous due to the risk of an accident and the increased risk of nuclear weapons or nuclear terrorism.
"You won't hear people worrying about terrorists getting hold of wind turbine parts, or making dirty bombs out of solar panels," Prof Lowe said.
The Prime Minister has suggested that renewable energy sources could be part of the mix but they would not meet Australia's base-load energy requirements. Prof Lowe doesn't buy it, noting that renewables already account for a quarter of the installed capacity of California, a third of Sweden's energy and three-quarters of Iceland's.
"Renewables can meet Australia's energy demands," he said. "By contrast nuclear power is expensive, slow and dangerous - and it won't stop climate change."
Parrot a late factor
Herald Sun
Friday 8/12/2006 Page: 54
A WIND farm built near a habitat of orange-bellied parrots was approved before risks were revealed, Environment Minister Ian Campbell has said. In April, Senator Campbell overturned Victorian Government approval for a 52-turbine farm at Bald Hills, Gippsland.
He used his discretionary powers under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Despite a departmental report indicating there would be negligible harm to the parrots, an independent Biosis report found more serious concerns about parrot deaths.
The minister blocked the $220 million project.
In a question on notice to Senator Campbell in September, Labor frontbencher Kelvin Thomson asked whether the Woolnorth and Musselroe Bay wind farms in Tasmania posed greater risks than the thwarted Bald Hills project.
The Woolnorth project is expected to have 79 turbines when completed.
Senator Campbell replied this week, stating that the Woolnorth installation and another wind farm near Portland in Victoria, which are both known parrot habitats, were early approvals under the EPBC Act and both were based on the best information available at the time.
"The Biosis report was completed in February 2006 and contained new and relevant information that I was required to take into account when considering the Bald Hills Wind Energy Installation proposal," he said.
"The Musselroe Wind Energy Installation was approved in 2005 and is not located within the known distributional range of the orange-bellied parrot." Senator Campbell denied he had vetoed a recommendation from his department that the Bald Hills project go ahead, saying that was merely one of several conclusions.
Friday 8/12/2006 Page: 54
A WIND farm built near a habitat of orange-bellied parrots was approved before risks were revealed, Environment Minister Ian Campbell has said. In April, Senator Campbell overturned Victorian Government approval for a 52-turbine farm at Bald Hills, Gippsland.
He used his discretionary powers under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act. Despite a departmental report indicating there would be negligible harm to the parrots, an independent Biosis report found more serious concerns about parrot deaths.
The minister blocked the $220 million project.
In a question on notice to Senator Campbell in September, Labor frontbencher Kelvin Thomson asked whether the Woolnorth and Musselroe Bay wind farms in Tasmania posed greater risks than the thwarted Bald Hills project.
The Woolnorth project is expected to have 79 turbines when completed.
Senator Campbell replied this week, stating that the Woolnorth installation and another wind farm near Portland in Victoria, which are both known parrot habitats, were early approvals under the EPBC Act and both were based on the best information available at the time.
"The Biosis report was completed in February 2006 and contained new and relevant information that I was required to take into account when considering the Bald Hills Wind Energy Installation proposal," he said.
"The Musselroe Wind Energy Installation was approved in 2005 and is not located within the known distributional range of the orange-bellied parrot." Senator Campbell denied he had vetoed a recommendation from his department that the Bald Hills project go ahead, saying that was merely one of several conclusions.
Time for holistic response on climate
Canberra Times
Friday 8/12/2006 Page: 25
THE CURRENT flurry about nuclear power in Australia misses the point.
What's really needed is a holistic approach to meeting our energy needs while also cutting greenhouse emissions. A startling aspect of the Prime Minister's draft Nuclear Taskforce report is the assumption that "Australia's demand for electricity will more than double before 2050". This doesn't have to be the case.
Our international panel of energy experts, who reviewed the draft nuclear report, told us,"The average Australian consumes about 12,000kWh per year; that is twice the EU average consumption per capita. The energy service delivered in Australia via these high consumption levels is not substantially different from the EU. If Australian citizens consumed the same amount of electricity as the Europeans, it could save half of the installed generation capacity, or 22,000 MW, rather than building new plants. Because efficiency is much cheaper than new generation, such a course would also lower Australians' electricity bills and make Australian industry more competitive in world markets." Energy efficiency is simple common sense.
Using more efficient appliances, better building codes and retro - fitting existing buildings are the great unsung hero in the climate-change debate. Even the Nuclear Taskforce report acknowledges that energy efficiency can contribute up to 50 per cent of the total CO, emissions reductions. And investing a dollar in energy-efficient appliances can save $2 or more through the whole energy system.
Unfortunately, Australia's record on improving energy efficiency has not been good compared with others. The European Union has just introduced an action plan to increase energy efficiency by 20 per cent by 2020, saving an estimated 100 billion ettros a year in energy bills and resulting in an overall decline in energy consumption.
Energy-efficiency measures will not leave the toxic legacy of radioactive waste for future generations, as does nuclear. The British Association for the Conservation of Energy says the most optimistic assumption is that one new nuclear power plant could be operating in Britain by 2020, delivering perhaps just over one million tonnes of carbon saving. In contrast, energy efficiency "could save around 25 million tonnes of carbon through cost-effective energyefficiency measures" by that date.
The other winner in the climate-change debate is renewable energy which, contrary to government claims, can deliver reliably and not just at the margins. It just requires a rethink about our energy systems, rather than a frozen-in-time approach.
Major energy economies, such as California, plan to fast-track renewables to provide 20 per cent of electricity by 2010 and 33 per cent by 2020. In parts of Germany and Denmark wind power provides 100 per cent of the region's power needs for months of the year, and excess electricity is exported to other parts of Europe.
Taking the renewable-energy route through active policy support can not only dramatically lower CO, emissions but position Australia as a leader in the rapidly growing global renewables marketplace. Solar and wind energy are the fastest-growing forms of electricity generation, with global growth rates of 40 per cent and 28 per cent a year over the past five years.
The global wind market is expected to have an annual turnover in 2006 of more than $A21.6 billion and employ more than 150,000 people. Wind is competitive with gas in some places in Australia and will become cheaper than coal in future. In an honest assessment of the true costs (decommissioning costs and waste) wind is already cheaper than nuclear power.
Australia's solar industry has been almost static since 2003. Last year Germany installed nearly 80 times as much solar power as Australia with an average of half our sunshine. Yet Australia could develop a solar market worth $5 billion by 2025, creating 44,000 jobs and cutting billions of tonnes of CO,.
If the Howard Government was serious about addressing climate change it would look at how to encourage greater energy efficiency and speed the uptake of wind, solar, geothermal and bioenergy.
Together renewable energy and energy efficiency can move its to a clean energy future - one that is not based on polluting energy such as coal and nuclear power.
Steve Shallhorn is the chief executive officer of Greenpeace Australia Pacific.
Friday 8/12/2006 Page: 25
THE CURRENT flurry about nuclear power in Australia misses the point.
What's really needed is a holistic approach to meeting our energy needs while also cutting greenhouse emissions. A startling aspect of the Prime Minister's draft Nuclear Taskforce report is the assumption that "Australia's demand for electricity will more than double before 2050". This doesn't have to be the case.
Our international panel of energy experts, who reviewed the draft nuclear report, told us,"The average Australian consumes about 12,000kWh per year; that is twice the EU average consumption per capita. The energy service delivered in Australia via these high consumption levels is not substantially different from the EU. If Australian citizens consumed the same amount of electricity as the Europeans, it could save half of the installed generation capacity, or 22,000 MW, rather than building new plants. Because efficiency is much cheaper than new generation, such a course would also lower Australians' electricity bills and make Australian industry more competitive in world markets." Energy efficiency is simple common sense.
Using more efficient appliances, better building codes and retro - fitting existing buildings are the great unsung hero in the climate-change debate. Even the Nuclear Taskforce report acknowledges that energy efficiency can contribute up to 50 per cent of the total CO, emissions reductions. And investing a dollar in energy-efficient appliances can save $2 or more through the whole energy system.
Unfortunately, Australia's record on improving energy efficiency has not been good compared with others. The European Union has just introduced an action plan to increase energy efficiency by 20 per cent by 2020, saving an estimated 100 billion ettros a year in energy bills and resulting in an overall decline in energy consumption.
Energy-efficiency measures will not leave the toxic legacy of radioactive waste for future generations, as does nuclear. The British Association for the Conservation of Energy says the most optimistic assumption is that one new nuclear power plant could be operating in Britain by 2020, delivering perhaps just over one million tonnes of carbon saving. In contrast, energy efficiency "could save around 25 million tonnes of carbon through cost-effective energyefficiency measures" by that date.
The other winner in the climate-change debate is renewable energy which, contrary to government claims, can deliver reliably and not just at the margins. It just requires a rethink about our energy systems, rather than a frozen-in-time approach.
Major energy economies, such as California, plan to fast-track renewables to provide 20 per cent of electricity by 2010 and 33 per cent by 2020. In parts of Germany and Denmark wind power provides 100 per cent of the region's power needs for months of the year, and excess electricity is exported to other parts of Europe.
Taking the renewable-energy route through active policy support can not only dramatically lower CO, emissions but position Australia as a leader in the rapidly growing global renewables marketplace. Solar and wind energy are the fastest-growing forms of electricity generation, with global growth rates of 40 per cent and 28 per cent a year over the past five years.
The global wind market is expected to have an annual turnover in 2006 of more than $A21.6 billion and employ more than 150,000 people. Wind is competitive with gas in some places in Australia and will become cheaper than coal in future. In an honest assessment of the true costs (decommissioning costs and waste) wind is already cheaper than nuclear power.
Australia's solar industry has been almost static since 2003. Last year Germany installed nearly 80 times as much solar power as Australia with an average of half our sunshine. Yet Australia could develop a solar market worth $5 billion by 2025, creating 44,000 jobs and cutting billions of tonnes of CO,.
If the Howard Government was serious about addressing climate change it would look at how to encourage greater energy efficiency and speed the uptake of wind, solar, geothermal and bioenergy.
Together renewable energy and energy efficiency can move its to a clean energy future - one that is not based on polluting energy such as coal and nuclear power.
Steve Shallhorn is the chief executive officer of Greenpeace Australia Pacific.
Wednesday, 6 December 2006
Kenya Makes Business Sense of Renewable Energy
Environment-Africa:
Wanjohi Kabukuru*
NAIROBI, Dec 4 (IPS/IFEJ) - The 12th session of the Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change came to an end in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, recently with little mention of cleaner sources of energy.
This was troubling, given the huge potential for such energy sources in Africa -- and the fact that a third of the world's population, the bulk coming from the continent, currently has no access to electricity.
According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, wood is amongst the main forms of energy in most rural homes in the developing world.
In Africa, renewable energy alternatives like solar, wind and geothermal resources remain largely untapped with the exception of Kenya, which obtains about 150 megawatts (MW) -- 10 percent of its energy -- from wells in the Rift Valley in East Africa. The power produced by geothermal means proved critical during the drought in 2001, when hydroelectric plants closed down for want of water.
In 2002, at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, governments turned down a proposal seeking to force countries to produce 10 percent of their energy needs from sustainable energy sources.
Geothermal energy, derived from rocks as hot as 345 degrees centigrade below the surface of the earth, is abundant in the Rift Valley: a giant fissure running 9,500 km from Lebanon to Mozambique.
"The potential of geothermal power in Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia stands at 3,000, 1,000 and 250 megawatts respectively. Of these Kenya, which leads in terms of exploitation of this energy, has only managed to harness some 150 megawatts. Ethiopia has exploited two megawatts and Uganda nil," observed Stephen Karekezi, director of the African Energy Policy Research Network, a Nairobi-based think tank.
Kenya has announced plans to up the contribution of geothermal energy in its power supply to 22 percent by 2019. Other countries exploiting geothermal sources include the U.S., Japan, Mexico, Italy, Indonesia and Philippines; one of the oldest plants in the world has been in operation since 1904 in Lardarello, Italy.
David Yuko, a Kenyan renewable energy consultant, makes a strong case for geothermal power in developing countries as a far cheaper alternative to large-scale conventional energy systems that require massive investment.
"Plants can be built on a modular basis, and can be scaled up as resources become available. Most renewable energy technologies are available at modest capital costs. Geothermal power reduces the import of fossil fuels, and this alone saves foreign exchange earnings," he argues.
"It is neither susceptible to drought nor is it subject to the direct effects of the globally volatile fossil fuel prices."
Kenya launched surface geothermal exploration soon after independence from Britain in 1963. Two wells were drilled at Olkaria in Naivasha, some 100 km from Nairobi. In the 1970s, more feasibility surveys were carried out between Olkaria and Lake Bogoria, a hot water spring lake in the Rift Valley.
In 1981 Africa's first ever geothermal power plant was commissioned, providing some 15 MW to the Kenyan power grid. By 1986, geothermal energy was figuring prominently in all the country's power plans.
There are myriad uses for this clean form of energy which releases negligible quantities of carbon dioxide compared to emissions from oil fired plants. Fumes belching from geothermal power plants are mostly eco-friendly steam vapour.
At a horticultural farm in Naivasha, geothermal heat is used to control night time humidity levels so as to alleviate incidences of fungal diseases. In nearby Eburru, low temperature geothermal steam is used for drying pyrethrum flowers.
'The Price of Power', an authoritative dossier prepared by the New Economics Foundation, a think tank in the United Kingdom, takes a dim view of fossil fuel energy for Africa. It notes that a year's worth of World Bank spending on conventional power projects, if redirected to small-scale solar installations in Africa, would provide 10 million people with electricity.
Karekezi said that in Kenya, the economic benefits of renewable energy sources opened the door to environmentally-sound initiatives using these sources. "We increased the uptake of renewable energies by stressing economic benefits such as job creation, lower energy costs and import bills. People are more concerned about economic problems because of the serious levels of poverty. The environment is fairly low on the priority list of many communities and governments," he noted.
New jobs have also been created through the construction, maintenance and operation of geothermal energy sources in Kenya. According to Yuko, "Niche markets, especially for direct geothermal energy applications, have taken advantage of emerging opportunities."
(* This story is part of a series of features on sustainable development by IPS -- Inter Press Service -- and IFEJ, the International Federation of Environmental Journalists.) (END/2006)
Wanjohi Kabukuru*
NAIROBI, Dec 4 (IPS/IFEJ) - The 12th session of the Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change came to an end in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, recently with little mention of cleaner sources of energy.
This was troubling, given the huge potential for such energy sources in Africa -- and the fact that a third of the world's population, the bulk coming from the continent, currently has no access to electricity.
According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, wood is amongst the main forms of energy in most rural homes in the developing world.
In Africa, renewable energy alternatives like solar, wind and geothermal resources remain largely untapped with the exception of Kenya, which obtains about 150 megawatts (MW) -- 10 percent of its energy -- from wells in the Rift Valley in East Africa. The power produced by geothermal means proved critical during the drought in 2001, when hydroelectric plants closed down for want of water.
In 2002, at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, South Africa, governments turned down a proposal seeking to force countries to produce 10 percent of their energy needs from sustainable energy sources.
Geothermal energy, derived from rocks as hot as 345 degrees centigrade below the surface of the earth, is abundant in the Rift Valley: a giant fissure running 9,500 km from Lebanon to Mozambique.
"The potential of geothermal power in Kenya, Uganda and Ethiopia stands at 3,000, 1,000 and 250 megawatts respectively. Of these Kenya, which leads in terms of exploitation of this energy, has only managed to harness some 150 megawatts. Ethiopia has exploited two megawatts and Uganda nil," observed Stephen Karekezi, director of the African Energy Policy Research Network, a Nairobi-based think tank.
Kenya has announced plans to up the contribution of geothermal energy in its power supply to 22 percent by 2019. Other countries exploiting geothermal sources include the U.S., Japan, Mexico, Italy, Indonesia and Philippines; one of the oldest plants in the world has been in operation since 1904 in Lardarello, Italy.
David Yuko, a Kenyan renewable energy consultant, makes a strong case for geothermal power in developing countries as a far cheaper alternative to large-scale conventional energy systems that require massive investment.
"Plants can be built on a modular basis, and can be scaled up as resources become available. Most renewable energy technologies are available at modest capital costs. Geothermal power reduces the import of fossil fuels, and this alone saves foreign exchange earnings," he argues.
"It is neither susceptible to drought nor is it subject to the direct effects of the globally volatile fossil fuel prices."
Kenya launched surface geothermal exploration soon after independence from Britain in 1963. Two wells were drilled at Olkaria in Naivasha, some 100 km from Nairobi. In the 1970s, more feasibility surveys were carried out between Olkaria and Lake Bogoria, a hot water spring lake in the Rift Valley.
In 1981 Africa's first ever geothermal power plant was commissioned, providing some 15 MW to the Kenyan power grid. By 1986, geothermal energy was figuring prominently in all the country's power plans.
There are myriad uses for this clean form of energy which releases negligible quantities of carbon dioxide compared to emissions from oil fired plants. Fumes belching from geothermal power plants are mostly eco-friendly steam vapour.
At a horticultural farm in Naivasha, geothermal heat is used to control night time humidity levels so as to alleviate incidences of fungal diseases. In nearby Eburru, low temperature geothermal steam is used for drying pyrethrum flowers.
'The Price of Power', an authoritative dossier prepared by the New Economics Foundation, a think tank in the United Kingdom, takes a dim view of fossil fuel energy for Africa. It notes that a year's worth of World Bank spending on conventional power projects, if redirected to small-scale solar installations in Africa, would provide 10 million people with electricity.
Karekezi said that in Kenya, the economic benefits of renewable energy sources opened the door to environmentally-sound initiatives using these sources. "We increased the uptake of renewable energies by stressing economic benefits such as job creation, lower energy costs and import bills. People are more concerned about economic problems because of the serious levels of poverty. The environment is fairly low on the priority list of many communities and governments," he noted.
New jobs have also been created through the construction, maintenance and operation of geothermal energy sources in Kenya. According to Yuko, "Niche markets, especially for direct geothermal energy applications, have taken advantage of emerging opportunities."
(* This story is part of a series of features on sustainable development by IPS -- Inter Press Service -- and IFEJ, the International Federation of Environmental Journalists.) (END/2006)
Greenhouse cuts to hit lucrative sectors
The Australian
04dec06
Matthew Warren, Environment writer
AUSTRALIA'S farm sector and multi-billion-dollar metals processing industry risk decimation if deep cuts in domestic greenhouse gas emissions are put in place by 2050. The grave warning is the result of modelling by the CSIRO and ABARE to be released this week.
Renewables rather than nuclear or clean coal are projected to be the big winners from significant emissions cuts in the future, with wind and biomass providing up to 41 per cent of power by 2050.
The modelling forecasts cuts in greenhouse emissions up to 50 per cent lower than 1990 will result in reductions to domestic output in metals processing of up to 74per cent and farm output of 44per cent by 2050.
Acknowledging the disproportionate impacts such cuts would have on regional employment, the report signals a role for government intervention to manage the transition to a low-emissions economy. The report also constructs a range of scenarios that may help drive change in Australia based on the success or failure of international agreements, environmental politics and technological developments.
While not a formal policy document, the CSIRO report singles out agriculture, aluminium, iron and steel industries as the most affected by responding to climate change, and flags the risk to Australia's balance of trade. These sectors make up only 5per cent of total domestic output but 30 per cent of the value of Australian exports.
"Some regions reliant on trade ... and carbon intensive industries may be disproportionately impacted if measures to protect those industries are not implemented," the report says.
"While these industries and regions may comprise relatively small proportions of the Australian economy, measures may need to be developed to assist them with the transition to new forms of production or to new industry." The report - The heat is on: the future of energy in Australia - by the Energy Futures Forum, will be launched tomorrow by the CSIRO after more than two years of development with input by ABARE, as well as industry and environment groups.
The risk of energy intensive industries shifting to other countries - carbon leakage - is found to be much greater if Australia attempts to impose higher emissions cuts than other nations.
The report says such leakage is plausible under these scenarios and flags exempting energy intensive and trade exposed industries from a carbon tax - an idea raised in the state-based emissions trading blueprint released in August.
Carbon capture and storage and nuclear energy may play a greater role in the future energy mix, along with solar energy and geothermal energy depending on their ability to reduce costs and, in the case of nuclear energy, manage public perceptions and regulatory risk.
Origin Energy spokesman Tony Wood said the report highlighted the importance of governments not picking specific technologies, but rather setting the right policy and price signals and letting the market deliver the most effective outcome.
"This whole debate about geosequestration and nuclear is really important to be able to make the transition over the long term," he said. "If neither of these turn out to be successful, that's a big issue for Australia. "What this work shows is that provided you start reasonably soon you can turn this ship without wrecking the economy."
The report also finds the economic cost of the impacts of climate change are likely to be higher than the cost of mitigation in all scenarios - a finding consistent with the report prepared for the British Government by former World Bank economist Nicholas Stern last month.
04dec06
Matthew Warren, Environment writer
AUSTRALIA'S farm sector and multi-billion-dollar metals processing industry risk decimation if deep cuts in domestic greenhouse gas emissions are put in place by 2050. The grave warning is the result of modelling by the CSIRO and ABARE to be released this week.
Renewables rather than nuclear or clean coal are projected to be the big winners from significant emissions cuts in the future, with wind and biomass providing up to 41 per cent of power by 2050.
The modelling forecasts cuts in greenhouse emissions up to 50 per cent lower than 1990 will result in reductions to domestic output in metals processing of up to 74per cent and farm output of 44per cent by 2050.
Acknowledging the disproportionate impacts such cuts would have on regional employment, the report signals a role for government intervention to manage the transition to a low-emissions economy. The report also constructs a range of scenarios that may help drive change in Australia based on the success or failure of international agreements, environmental politics and technological developments.
While not a formal policy document, the CSIRO report singles out agriculture, aluminium, iron and steel industries as the most affected by responding to climate change, and flags the risk to Australia's balance of trade. These sectors make up only 5per cent of total domestic output but 30 per cent of the value of Australian exports.
"Some regions reliant on trade ... and carbon intensive industries may be disproportionately impacted if measures to protect those industries are not implemented," the report says.
"While these industries and regions may comprise relatively small proportions of the Australian economy, measures may need to be developed to assist them with the transition to new forms of production or to new industry." The report - The heat is on: the future of energy in Australia - by the Energy Futures Forum, will be launched tomorrow by the CSIRO after more than two years of development with input by ABARE, as well as industry and environment groups.
The risk of energy intensive industries shifting to other countries - carbon leakage - is found to be much greater if Australia attempts to impose higher emissions cuts than other nations.
The report says such leakage is plausible under these scenarios and flags exempting energy intensive and trade exposed industries from a carbon tax - an idea raised in the state-based emissions trading blueprint released in August.
Carbon capture and storage and nuclear energy may play a greater role in the future energy mix, along with solar energy and geothermal energy depending on their ability to reduce costs and, in the case of nuclear energy, manage public perceptions and regulatory risk.
Origin Energy spokesman Tony Wood said the report highlighted the importance of governments not picking specific technologies, but rather setting the right policy and price signals and letting the market deliver the most effective outcome.
"This whole debate about geosequestration and nuclear is really important to be able to make the transition over the long term," he said. "If neither of these turn out to be successful, that's a big issue for Australia. "What this work shows is that provided you start reasonably soon you can turn this ship without wrecking the economy."
The report also finds the economic cost of the impacts of climate change are likely to be higher than the cost of mitigation in all scenarios - a finding consistent with the report prepared for the British Government by former World Bank economist Nicholas Stern last month.
Combating global warming
Electrical Connection
Friday 1/12/2006 Page: 62
With fossil fuels out of favour, wind and solar power are increasing in popularity as
cleaner, greener and more efficient forms of energy, writes Joanna Gerantidis.
The new millennium has seen the emergence of solar power and wind farms as serious contenders to help address rising concerns over greenhouse gas, which is just one of the environmentally unfriendly by-products of fossil-fuelled power stations.
Unchecked, climate change represents a serious challenge to human health, economies and environments, which is why an increasing number of countries around the globe are beginning to add more low-emission and emission-free energy into the overall energy mix.
Solar panels and wind farms are providing viable solutions to these issues as well as supplying electricity to homes and offices.
In October the South Australian Government announced legislation for a new `feed in' solar rebate. This is an Australian first that will see householders who install solar power in their homes rewarded for putting surplus solar power back into the main electricity grid.
The new rebate ties in with the Federal Government's $75.3 million `Solar Cities' initiative which has been implemented by the Department of the Environment and Heritage. The primary focus of the project is to demonstrate how solar power, smart meters, energy efficiency and new approaches to electricity pricing can combine to provide a sustainable energy future in urban locations across Australia.
The first `test' city is Adelaide which, with the aid of a $15 million government grant, will work together with Origin Energy, BP Solar, Big Switch Projects, the City of Salisbury, Mawson Lakes Development and the ANZ Banking Group to assist consumers, conmiunities, businesses and governments to be proactive in energy sustainability.
A key aim of the initiative is to install solar panels in more than 1700 homes in North Adelaide, as well as 7000 smart meters to help consumers save approximately $200 a year on their electricity bills.
The solar panels will be made in Australia by BP Solar at the company's Homebush plant in Sydney. The solar photovoltaic (PV) technology will come from Origin Energy's Adelaide plant.
According to Australian Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE) director Ric Brazzale, the $15 million government grant will aid in offering consumers discounted loans when they purchase solar panels for their homes. A comprehensive package of measures will double the current capacity of solar panels in South Australia, provide energy savings of $5 million per year, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 30,000 tonnes per year.
"Consider a recent study by the Queensland Government which found that for every air conditioner installed in a home the electricity industry has to spend an extra $13,000 on additional poles, wires and substations to mange the extra load. Ultimately, to meet the needs of a few it is the consumers who have to pay," he says.
Ric says that a major benefit of solar PV power is that it is generated on site, where the energy is actually needed. This means that no electricity is lost in transmission, as is the case from coal-fired power plants, which lose 30% of their electricity in transmission.
"Because solar generation is at many sites on many roofs, instead of being concentrated in one big power plant, there are fewer blackouts.
Australia's peak power needs are rising rapidly with a staggering $24 billion already comnutted to electricity infrastructure over the next five years. Yet much of this peak demand will be required for just a few hours a day on a handful of days throughout the year," says Ric.
"By utilising the sorts of technologies and designs offered by Solar Cities, newer and more efficient ways of meeting demand will be demonstrated to be more sustainable and economically efficient. This is a great boost to the solar power industry and a large proportion ofAustralian households could support solar photovoltaic systems" After being named Queensland's first Solar City, Townsville joins Adelaide as one of the first cities set to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by more than 50,000 tonnes per year.
Like Adelaide, Townsville will invest part of its $15 million government grant in the installation of solar panels in 500 homes and businesses and the rollout of 2500 smart meters and 1700 inhouse energy display meters. Townsville's project partners are Ergon Energy, Townsville City Council, HIG Riverway, Delfin Townsville and the Queensland Government.
More solar cities are slated to be announced by the Federal Government at a later date. There is also growing interest to increase the number of wind farms in Australia.
Australia has world-class wind resources, particularly in southern Australia and Tasmania, which he in the path of the Roaring Forties - the prevailing westerly winds that circle the earth's high southern latitudes.
The Australian Wind Energy Association (Auswind) says there is potential for at least an additional 5000MW of wind power - an investment of some $20 billion. In 1996, there were only 20 wind turbines operating in Australia, with a total energy generating capacity of approximately 2.7MW. Today, there are around 505 wind turbines with a total capacity of about 817MW.
Wind energy has grown at around 28% per year worldwide thanks to policies that encourage clean energy production. Auswind chief executive Dominique La Fontaine, says that compared to the US, India and China, Australia has been relatively slow to adopt wind farms. The main objection has always been that a move to this renewable source would push up energy costs, but Dominique says that this mindset is beginning to change, particularly as a number of Australian companies have emerged as wind farm project specialists in site monitoring, design, installation and operation and maintenance. These firms include Pacific Power International, Pacific Hydro,Western Power Corporation and Hydro Tasmania.
"The latest figures show that Australians recognise that tackling climate change is far more important than a few dollars extra on an electricity bill.
"Australia has plenty of investors just waiting for the right signals from Canberra to show that Australia also welcomes wind energy. Schemes like the Victorian Renewable Energy Target (VRET) have shown a potential for huge investment in wind energy and its potential to deliver clean electricity while providing a boost to regional economies," she says.
Recipe For Environmental Success
Victoria believes it has the recipe for an infinite supply of clean and affordable energy.
The Federal and State Governments have announced they will provide $125 million in grants towards a $420 million proposal by Melbourne-based company Solar Systems, to build the world's largest solar power station between Swan Hill and Mildura by 2013.
The power station will be built across a number of different sites and use highperformance solar cells originally developed to power satellites. Solar Systems technology will have the capacity to concentrate the sun by 500 times onto the solar cells for ultra-high power output.
The proposed funding will also go towards developing solar and wind technologies to create renewable energy sources. The power station will use technology known as Heliostat Concentrator Photovoltaic (HCPV) that will consist of fields of heliostats sun-tracking mirrors that focus sunlight onto receivers. The receivers will house PV modules, which consist of arrays of ultra high efficiency solar cells that convert sunlight directly into electricity.
Solar Systems' managing director Dave Holland says it's an exciting opportunity for the company, which has invested over $50 million since it began developing the technology 16 years ago.
"This plant is the first step in a strategic plan to roll out large scale solar technology across Australia and internationally. The plant will make a significant contribution towards reducing Victoria's environmental impact by reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 400,000 tonnes per year.
"The project is also important for Victoria's and Australia's economy. It is expected to create approximately 950 jobs at the peak of construction and be a catalyst for a new industry that will create more than 10,000 permanent jobs," Dave says.
Australian Business Council for Sustainable Energy www.bcse.org.au
03 9349 3077
Australian Wind Energy Association www.auswind.org
03 9670 2033
Friday 1/12/2006 Page: 62
With fossil fuels out of favour, wind and solar power are increasing in popularity ascleaner, greener and more efficient forms of energy, writes Joanna Gerantidis.
The new millennium has seen the emergence of solar power and wind farms as serious contenders to help address rising concerns over greenhouse gas, which is just one of the environmentally unfriendly by-products of fossil-fuelled power stations.
Unchecked, climate change represents a serious challenge to human health, economies and environments, which is why an increasing number of countries around the globe are beginning to add more low-emission and emission-free energy into the overall energy mix.
Solar panels and wind farms are providing viable solutions to these issues as well as supplying electricity to homes and offices.
In October the South Australian Government announced legislation for a new `feed in' solar rebate. This is an Australian first that will see householders who install solar power in their homes rewarded for putting surplus solar power back into the main electricity grid.
The new rebate ties in with the Federal Government's $75.3 million `Solar Cities' initiative which has been implemented by the Department of the Environment and Heritage. The primary focus of the project is to demonstrate how solar power, smart meters, energy efficiency and new approaches to electricity pricing can combine to provide a sustainable energy future in urban locations across Australia.
The first `test' city is Adelaide which, with the aid of a $15 million government grant, will work together with Origin Energy, BP Solar, Big Switch Projects, the City of Salisbury, Mawson Lakes Development and the ANZ Banking Group to assist consumers, conmiunities, businesses and governments to be proactive in energy sustainability.
A key aim of the initiative is to install solar panels in more than 1700 homes in North Adelaide, as well as 7000 smart meters to help consumers save approximately $200 a year on their electricity bills.
The solar panels will be made in Australia by BP Solar at the company's Homebush plant in Sydney. The solar photovoltaic (PV) technology will come from Origin Energy's Adelaide plant.
According to Australian Business Council for Sustainable Energy (BCSE) director Ric Brazzale, the $15 million government grant will aid in offering consumers discounted loans when they purchase solar panels for their homes. A comprehensive package of measures will double the current capacity of solar panels in South Australia, provide energy savings of $5 million per year, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 30,000 tonnes per year.
"Consider a recent study by the Queensland Government which found that for every air conditioner installed in a home the electricity industry has to spend an extra $13,000 on additional poles, wires and substations to mange the extra load. Ultimately, to meet the needs of a few it is the consumers who have to pay," he says.
Ric says that a major benefit of solar PV power is that it is generated on site, where the energy is actually needed. This means that no electricity is lost in transmission, as is the case from coal-fired power plants, which lose 30% of their electricity in transmission.
"Because solar generation is at many sites on many roofs, instead of being concentrated in one big power plant, there are fewer blackouts.
Australia's peak power needs are rising rapidly with a staggering $24 billion already comnutted to electricity infrastructure over the next five years. Yet much of this peak demand will be required for just a few hours a day on a handful of days throughout the year," says Ric.
"By utilising the sorts of technologies and designs offered by Solar Cities, newer and more efficient ways of meeting demand will be demonstrated to be more sustainable and economically efficient. This is a great boost to the solar power industry and a large proportion ofAustralian households could support solar photovoltaic systems" After being named Queensland's first Solar City, Townsville joins Adelaide as one of the first cities set to cut its greenhouse gas emissions by more than 50,000 tonnes per year.
Like Adelaide, Townsville will invest part of its $15 million government grant in the installation of solar panels in 500 homes and businesses and the rollout of 2500 smart meters and 1700 inhouse energy display meters. Townsville's project partners are Ergon Energy, Townsville City Council, HIG Riverway, Delfin Townsville and the Queensland Government.
More solar cities are slated to be announced by the Federal Government at a later date. There is also growing interest to increase the number of wind farms in Australia.
Australia has world-class wind resources, particularly in southern Australia and Tasmania, which he in the path of the Roaring Forties - the prevailing westerly winds that circle the earth's high southern latitudes.
The Australian Wind Energy Association (Auswind) says there is potential for at least an additional 5000MW of wind power - an investment of some $20 billion. In 1996, there were only 20 wind turbines operating in Australia, with a total energy generating capacity of approximately 2.7MW. Today, there are around 505 wind turbines with a total capacity of about 817MW.
Wind energy has grown at around 28% per year worldwide thanks to policies that encourage clean energy production. Auswind chief executive Dominique La Fontaine, says that compared to the US, India and China, Australia has been relatively slow to adopt wind farms. The main objection has always been that a move to this renewable source would push up energy costs, but Dominique says that this mindset is beginning to change, particularly as a number of Australian companies have emerged as wind farm project specialists in site monitoring, design, installation and operation and maintenance. These firms include Pacific Power International, Pacific Hydro,Western Power Corporation and Hydro Tasmania.
"The latest figures show that Australians recognise that tackling climate change is far more important than a few dollars extra on an electricity bill.
"Australia has plenty of investors just waiting for the right signals from Canberra to show that Australia also welcomes wind energy. Schemes like the Victorian Renewable Energy Target (VRET) have shown a potential for huge investment in wind energy and its potential to deliver clean electricity while providing a boost to regional economies," she says.
Recipe For Environmental Success
Victoria believes it has the recipe for an infinite supply of clean and affordable energy.
The Federal and State Governments have announced they will provide $125 million in grants towards a $420 million proposal by Melbourne-based company Solar Systems, to build the world's largest solar power station between Swan Hill and Mildura by 2013.
The power station will be built across a number of different sites and use highperformance solar cells originally developed to power satellites. Solar Systems technology will have the capacity to concentrate the sun by 500 times onto the solar cells for ultra-high power output.
The proposed funding will also go towards developing solar and wind technologies to create renewable energy sources. The power station will use technology known as Heliostat Concentrator Photovoltaic (HCPV) that will consist of fields of heliostats sun-tracking mirrors that focus sunlight onto receivers. The receivers will house PV modules, which consist of arrays of ultra high efficiency solar cells that convert sunlight directly into electricity.
Solar Systems' managing director Dave Holland says it's an exciting opportunity for the company, which has invested over $50 million since it began developing the technology 16 years ago.
"This plant is the first step in a strategic plan to roll out large scale solar technology across Australia and internationally. The plant will make a significant contribution towards reducing Victoria's environmental impact by reducing greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 400,000 tonnes per year.
"The project is also important for Victoria's and Australia's economy. It is expected to create approximately 950 jobs at the peak of construction and be a catalyst for a new industry that will create more than 10,000 permanent jobs," Dave says.
Australian Business Council for Sustainable Energy www.bcse.org.au
03 9349 3077
Australian Wind Energy Association www.auswind.org
03 9670 2033
Legal threat in wind farm dispute
Australian
Wednesday 6/12/2006 Page: 4
Ewin Hannan
THE developer of the Victorian wind farm blocked because of a perceived threat to the orangebellied parrot has threatened fresh legal action against federal Environment Minister Ian Campbell unless he rules on the project by next week.
Wind Power Pty Ltd yesterday condemned Senator Campbell's refusal to rule on the $220 million project and warned it would take Federal Court action to compel him to make a decision. Senator Campbell said last month he would await fresh advice from his department - which has previously supported the wind farm - before announcing his decision on the green energy project.
Wind Power Pty Ltd director Andrew Newbold said company lawyers had written to the minister seeking a ruling by Friday week.
"We are trying to. .. compel him to make a decision in accordance with his (legal) obligations," he said. ' `The simple fact is this project has been delayed for an inordinate amount of time already." A spokesman for Senator Campbell said last night the company's letter was "perplexing", given that the department was yet to provide advice to the minister. "He has always said he would make a timely decision when that advice has been received."
Wednesday 6/12/2006 Page: 4
Ewin Hannan
THE developer of the Victorian wind farm blocked because of a perceived threat to the orangebellied parrot has threatened fresh legal action against federal Environment Minister Ian Campbell unless he rules on the project by next week.
Wind Power Pty Ltd yesterday condemned Senator Campbell's refusal to rule on the $220 million project and warned it would take Federal Court action to compel him to make a decision. Senator Campbell said last month he would await fresh advice from his department - which has previously supported the wind farm - before announcing his decision on the green energy project.
Wind Power Pty Ltd director Andrew Newbold said company lawyers had written to the minister seeking a ruling by Friday week.
"We are trying to. .. compel him to make a decision in accordance with his (legal) obligations," he said. ' `The simple fact is this project has been delayed for an inordinate amount of time already." A spokesman for Senator Campbell said last night the company's letter was "perplexing", given that the department was yet to provide advice to the minister. "He has always said he would make a timely decision when that advice has been received."
Cool it: With a little help from non-Silicon Valley
Economist
Monday 1/1/2007 Page: 144
If you fancy walking to the North Pole, 2007 is not I going to be a very good year for it. That said, it might be your last chance. The sea-ice that tops off our planet like a gleaming case of male-pattern baldness is retreating at a rate Rogaine-users could only dream of, and is likely to go on doing so.The retreat of the sea-ice is one of the many reasons why doubts about the reality of anthropogenic climate change are in even steeper decline.
For all practical purposes 2007 will see those doubts laid to rest. Early in the year the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will release its fourth "Assessment Report", the third having been published in 2001. It will say that greenhouse gases are at their highest levels for at least 650,000 years, and possibly many millions of years more; that there is a high likelihood that the modest global warming of the past 50 years can be attributed to the industrial pumping out of those greenhouse gases; and that further warming is unavoidable.
The largest source of uncertainty about human effects on the climate no longer lies in science. It lies in what can be predicted about, or indeed what limits can be enforced on, the world's use of fossil fuels. In 2007 this question will sit in its rightful position at the centre of the debate.
The good news is that some industries and previously uninterested governments have already caught on to this. Environmental regulations in China are toughening up and there is hope for serious energy efficiency measures there (China's emission standards for cars and trucks are already, shamingly, more stringent than America's). Meanwhile, in America and Europe "Cleantech", including alternative energy technologies, is one of the fastest-growing categories in venture capital.
Of the new technologies seeking R&D, capital and markets, the one worth paying particular heed to in 2007 will be solar energy. Wind turbines will, from now until the end of time, be subject to only incremental improvements: they will become a bit more efficient, a hit cheaper to install, and a bit cheaper to build. Solar, on the other hand, is ripe for breakthroughs. The material which forms the basis of the vast majority of today's solar cells, silicon, is expensive and cumbersome. There is no compelling reason why new materials of a tenth or a twentieth the price of silicon could not be used-all that is needed is ingenuity, incentives private or public, and knowledge of the relevant subtleties of physics and chemistry. None of these factors is at present a limited resource; indeed they are all growing. In 2007 a Silicon Valley start-up, Nanosolar, will open the first really large non-silicon solar-cell factory. Many more will follow.
Even with sustained growth in energy efficiency and carbon-free generation, there is more warming in store. How fast we should move in cutting emissions will still be a source of vigorous debate in 2007. But the need to start will be clearer than ever.
Monday 1/1/2007 Page: 144
If you fancy walking to the North Pole, 2007 is not I going to be a very good year for it. That said, it might be your last chance. The sea-ice that tops off our planet like a gleaming case of male-pattern baldness is retreating at a rate Rogaine-users could only dream of, and is likely to go on doing so.The retreat of the sea-ice is one of the many reasons why doubts about the reality of anthropogenic climate change are in even steeper decline.
For all practical purposes 2007 will see those doubts laid to rest. Early in the year the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change will release its fourth "Assessment Report", the third having been published in 2001. It will say that greenhouse gases are at their highest levels for at least 650,000 years, and possibly many millions of years more; that there is a high likelihood that the modest global warming of the past 50 years can be attributed to the industrial pumping out of those greenhouse gases; and that further warming is unavoidable.
The largest source of uncertainty about human effects on the climate no longer lies in science. It lies in what can be predicted about, or indeed what limits can be enforced on, the world's use of fossil fuels. In 2007 this question will sit in its rightful position at the centre of the debate.
The good news is that some industries and previously uninterested governments have already caught on to this. Environmental regulations in China are toughening up and there is hope for serious energy efficiency measures there (China's emission standards for cars and trucks are already, shamingly, more stringent than America's). Meanwhile, in America and Europe "Cleantech", including alternative energy technologies, is one of the fastest-growing categories in venture capital.
Of the new technologies seeking R&D, capital and markets, the one worth paying particular heed to in 2007 will be solar energy. Wind turbines will, from now until the end of time, be subject to only incremental improvements: they will become a bit more efficient, a hit cheaper to install, and a bit cheaper to build. Solar, on the other hand, is ripe for breakthroughs. The material which forms the basis of the vast majority of today's solar cells, silicon, is expensive and cumbersome. There is no compelling reason why new materials of a tenth or a twentieth the price of silicon could not be used-all that is needed is ingenuity, incentives private or public, and knowledge of the relevant subtleties of physics and chemistry. None of these factors is at present a limited resource; indeed they are all growing. In 2007 a Silicon Valley start-up, Nanosolar, will open the first really large non-silicon solar-cell factory. Many more will follow.
Even with sustained growth in energy efficiency and carbon-free generation, there is more warming in store. How fast we should move in cutting emissions will still be a source of vigorous debate in 2007. But the need to start will be clearer than ever.
Wind farm
Albany & Great Southern Weekender
Thursday 30/11/2006 Page: 6
A WIND farm proposed for Mount Barker has passed the first stage.
The Shire of Plantagenet agreed to initiate a town planning scheme amendment on farmland north of the town to enable a wind farm to be established.
The amendment will be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority before proceeding to a formal public comment period of 42 days.
Thursday 30/11/2006 Page: 6
A WIND farm proposed for Mount Barker has passed the first stage.
The Shire of Plantagenet agreed to initiate a town planning scheme amendment on farmland north of the town to enable a wind farm to be established.
The amendment will be referred to the Environmental Protection Authority before proceeding to a formal public comment period of 42 days.
Monday, 4 December 2006
Wind Power's ahead
Ballarat Courier
Saturday 2/12/2006 Page: 30
WIND FARM company Wind Power Pty Ltd has placed an application with the Pyrenees Shire Council for its plans to build a 19-turbine wind farm at Lexton. The proposal, which the company has been looking at for some time, will provide enough power to supply about 16,000 homes.
The facility will also displace about 113,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, or greenhouse gas a year, the equivalent of taking 26,000 cars off the road. Director Andrew Newbold said Lexton was a very good location for a wind farm and the company was very excited about the project.
"The site has an excellent wind resource is located along the Ballarat-Horsham Transmission Line, which means there is good access to the grid," Mr Newbold said. He said the closest neighbouring house to the wind farm was more than a kilometre from the nearest turbine.
Mr Newbold said support from the community had been fantastic, and said the community was "fair-dinkum" about tackling issues of climate change as well as developing our sustainable future. "The community is concerned about a lack of water, salinity and climate change," he said.
"Many homes in the area have solar power and people around Lexton are aware of how important it is to manage our demand for electricity." The company is still in discussions over its plans to build a 70-turbine wind farm at Stockyard Hill near Beaufort.
The wind farm is estimated to cost more than $250 million. The Pyrenees Shire Council was not available for comment yesterday.
Saturday 2/12/2006 Page: 30
WIND FARM company Wind Power Pty Ltd has placed an application with the Pyrenees Shire Council for its plans to build a 19-turbine wind farm at Lexton. The proposal, which the company has been looking at for some time, will provide enough power to supply about 16,000 homes.
The facility will also displace about 113,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide, or greenhouse gas a year, the equivalent of taking 26,000 cars off the road. Director Andrew Newbold said Lexton was a very good location for a wind farm and the company was very excited about the project.
"The site has an excellent wind resource is located along the Ballarat-Horsham Transmission Line, which means there is good access to the grid," Mr Newbold said. He said the closest neighbouring house to the wind farm was more than a kilometre from the nearest turbine.
Mr Newbold said support from the community had been fantastic, and said the community was "fair-dinkum" about tackling issues of climate change as well as developing our sustainable future. "The community is concerned about a lack of water, salinity and climate change," he said.
"Many homes in the area have solar power and people around Lexton are aware of how important it is to manage our demand for electricity." The company is still in discussions over its plans to build a 70-turbine wind farm at Stockyard Hill near Beaufort.
The wind farm is estimated to cost more than $250 million. The Pyrenees Shire Council was not available for comment yesterday.
Spain takes some of the wind out of its clean energy sails
Age
Monday 4/12/2006 Page: 3
Madrid: Spain is to cut subsidies to windpower plants following an overhaul of the way it calculates aid for renewable power sources, hurting earnings at utilities including lberdrola SA, the world's largest producer of wind power.
Electricity from wind will be paid between 67 ($A112) and 84 per megawatt hour starting next year, down from about 97 this year, Spain's secretary of state for energy, Ignasi Nieto, told reporters on the sidelines of a conference in Palma de Mallorca.
Rates will rise for solar and biomass plants as well as for co-generation sources that generate power and heat. "Wind-power subsidies were exaggeratedly high, especially since the technology has developed in the last few years and costs have fallen," Mr Nieto said.
Spanish subsidies for wind power in the past eight years have helped it become the world's second largest producer of wind power after Germany. Spain is trying to curb the emission of carbon dioxide, the gas blamed for global warming, while meeting soaring demand for electricity as its economy grows faster than the European average.
Overall, Spain will devote 1.8 billion a year until 2010 to subsidising wind power, 50 per cent more than this year. Solar power subsidies will almost double.
"The new rates will not mean less wind parks are built because they will still be making more money that they were a few years ago," Mr Nieto said. The Government plan has been sent to energy industry regulators for review.
Monday 4/12/2006 Page: 3
Madrid: Spain is to cut subsidies to windpower plants following an overhaul of the way it calculates aid for renewable power sources, hurting earnings at utilities including lberdrola SA, the world's largest producer of wind power.
Electricity from wind will be paid between 67 ($A112) and 84 per megawatt hour starting next year, down from about 97 this year, Spain's secretary of state for energy, Ignasi Nieto, told reporters on the sidelines of a conference in Palma de Mallorca.
Rates will rise for solar and biomass plants as well as for co-generation sources that generate power and heat. "Wind-power subsidies were exaggeratedly high, especially since the technology has developed in the last few years and costs have fallen," Mr Nieto said.
Spanish subsidies for wind power in the past eight years have helped it become the world's second largest producer of wind power after Germany. Spain is trying to curb the emission of carbon dioxide, the gas blamed for global warming, while meeting soaring demand for electricity as its economy grows faster than the European average.
Overall, Spain will devote 1.8 billion a year until 2010 to subsidising wind power, 50 per cent more than this year. Solar power subsidies will almost double.
"The new rates will not mean less wind parks are built because they will still be making more money that they were a few years ago," Mr Nieto said. The Government plan has been sent to energy industry regulators for review.
Awards for Kings Creek
Frankston Independent
Tuesday 28/11/2006, Page: 22
Kings Creek Hotel is a winner on two counts - its drive-through bottle shop and the wind turbine that towers over the hotel in Frankston-Flinders Rd, Hastings.
Kings Creek's liquor barn was voted best hotel bottle shop and drive-through in the state at the annual Australian Hotel Association state awards at Crown Casino. Also Kings Creek was awarded for "outstanding innovation in environmentally sustainable practice" at the Frankston and Mornington Peninsula Business awards.
Judges said the liquor barn showed excellence in sustainability with its wind turbine running the fridges and lighting.
The hotel association judges also took into account the Creek's gardens, convenience, staff service, competitive pricing and variety of beers, wines and spirits.
The liquor barn site was formerly occupied by an independent service station in the early 80s. It was the highest volume and first LPG site on the Mornington Peninsula, but was converted to its present use when independents were forced out of the market, said Kings Creek owner Bruce Alderson, who also operated the service station.
The hotel welcomes family visits to the turbine as the Aldersons try to increase community awareness of sustainable energy production and its beneficial effects on the fight against global warming.
Tuesday 28/11/2006, Page: 22
Kings Creek Hotel is a winner on two counts - its drive-through bottle shop and the wind turbine that towers over the hotel in Frankston-Flinders Rd, Hastings.
Kings Creek's liquor barn was voted best hotel bottle shop and drive-through in the state at the annual Australian Hotel Association state awards at Crown Casino. Also Kings Creek was awarded for "outstanding innovation in environmentally sustainable practice" at the Frankston and Mornington Peninsula Business awards.
Judges said the liquor barn showed excellence in sustainability with its wind turbine running the fridges and lighting.
The hotel association judges also took into account the Creek's gardens, convenience, staff service, competitive pricing and variety of beers, wines and spirits.
The liquor barn site was formerly occupied by an independent service station in the early 80s. It was the highest volume and first LPG site on the Mornington Peninsula, but was converted to its present use when independents were forced out of the market, said Kings Creek owner Bruce Alderson, who also operated the service station.
The hotel welcomes family visits to the turbine as the Aldersons try to increase community awareness of sustainable energy production and its beneficial effects on the fight against global warming.
Wave energy a possible option for Gracetown
Augusta Margaret River Mail
Wednesday 29/11/2006 Page: 2
ENERGY company Renewable Energy Holdings has had discussions with Landcorp and Planning and Infrastructure Minister Alannah MacTiernan with a view to deploying a wave energy system at Gracetown.
REH owns and runs windfarms in Europe, and a spokesman said the company looked forward to explaining its Western Australian developed wave energy system to local people.
Using wave energy to generate electricity and fresh water could be a reality for the town in three years. "The area is ideally suited to wave energy," he said. "REH's CETO technology is ideally suited as it produces both fresh water and electricity.
It floats below the surface, would be invisible from the shore and it will not be deployed in any surf breaks. The worst thing that could happen to it, he said, was a leak of high-pressure seawater.
In early 2005 a wave energy converter unit was launched off the company's test facility on North Mole Drive on Fremantle Harbour. The unit, called CETO after a sea goddess in Greek mythology, was sunk on demarcated seabed about 300m from the Rous Head test facility.
In May, it was announced the CETO wave energy converter had produced electrical power and desalinated water good enough to bottle. CETO was designed and developed by Western Australian company Seapower Pacific Pty Ltd, which was acquired by REH in 2005.
The CETO pipe pumps pressurised seawater ashore to drive a turbine to produce electricity or a reverse-osmosis filter to produce fresh water. Each unit can produce enough power for about 100 homes.
The commercialisation of wave energy units has occurred mostly in the United States. China, India and Japan also are investing in wave energy research and development.
Wednesday 29/11/2006 Page: 2
ENERGY company Renewable Energy Holdings has had discussions with Landcorp and Planning and Infrastructure Minister Alannah MacTiernan with a view to deploying a wave energy system at Gracetown.
REH owns and runs windfarms in Europe, and a spokesman said the company looked forward to explaining its Western Australian developed wave energy system to local people.
Using wave energy to generate electricity and fresh water could be a reality for the town in three years. "The area is ideally suited to wave energy," he said. "REH's CETO technology is ideally suited as it produces both fresh water and electricity.
It floats below the surface, would be invisible from the shore and it will not be deployed in any surf breaks. The worst thing that could happen to it, he said, was a leak of high-pressure seawater.
In early 2005 a wave energy converter unit was launched off the company's test facility on North Mole Drive on Fremantle Harbour. The unit, called CETO after a sea goddess in Greek mythology, was sunk on demarcated seabed about 300m from the Rous Head test facility.
In May, it was announced the CETO wave energy converter had produced electrical power and desalinated water good enough to bottle. CETO was designed and developed by Western Australian company Seapower Pacific Pty Ltd, which was acquired by REH in 2005.
The CETO pipe pumps pressurised seawater ashore to drive a turbine to produce electricity or a reverse-osmosis filter to produce fresh water. Each unit can produce enough power for about 100 homes.
The commercialisation of wave energy units has occurred mostly in the United States. China, India and Japan also are investing in wave energy research and development.
Thursday, 30 November 2006
Growing number of states requiring alternative energy
Posted 11/23/2006
DENVER — Renewable energy is gathering steam in several states as voters and governors push electric utilities to generate a set percentage of electricity from clean sources such as wind and solar power.
In Washington state, voters approved a measure Nov. 7 mandating that 15% of electrical power come from renewable sources by 2020.
That makes 20 states and the District of Columbia with such requirements, according to the Department of Energy. Two others states — Illinois and Vermont — have non-binding goals on using renewable energy sources.
More states are forcing utilities toward wind, solar and other renewable energy sources, such as geothermal and biomass, to cut the use of coal and natural gas and spur greater U.S. energy independence. Burning coal produces greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide that contribute to climate change. Power plants fueled by natural gas pollute the air with sulfur dioxide.
Opponents, including some utilities and industries, say the switch will be costly for consumers and businesses. In Senate testimony last year, the National Association of Manufacturers opposed a proposed federal requirement to use renewable energy because it would reduce the flexibility of utilities in choosing fuels and harm businesses trying to remain competitive by containing costs.
Other states taking action:
"We're going to move aggressively" on increasing the use of solar and wind power, says state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. "Colorado ought to be a leader in this field, and it's been lapped by more aggressive states."
Colorado voters in 2004 approved a referendum requiring that the state draw 10% of its electricity from renewable sources. In October, the state's largest utility, Xcel Energy, announced it will meet the 10% target by next year. Xcel's quick success reflects, in part, the abundance of solar power and wind in Colorado, which is not the case everywhere.
Xcel, which serves 1.3 million customers in Colorado, is studying how it could attain a higher percentage, spokesman Tom Henley says. That's "something we're looking at. ... The only question is whether it would be prudent." He points to the intermittent reliability of wind and solar power.
Xcel was moving toward large-scale purchases of renewable electricity before the 2004 vote, Henley says. It has contracts with four large wind-electricity producers, is awaiting regulatory approval to build a large solar plant in southern Colorado and pays credits and rebates to homeowners and businesses that install solar panels.
Progress in the states could spur Congress to enact a federal standard, predicts Anna Aurelio, director of the Washington office of U.S. PIRG, a national environmental group. The Senate in 2005 approved a 10% mandate that failed in the House, and Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., incoming chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has said he will try again.
"This is a huge opportunity right now," Aurelio says.
DENVER — Renewable energy is gathering steam in several states as voters and governors push electric utilities to generate a set percentage of electricity from clean sources such as wind and solar power.In Washington state, voters approved a measure Nov. 7 mandating that 15% of electrical power come from renewable sources by 2020.
That makes 20 states and the District of Columbia with such requirements, according to the Department of Energy. Two others states — Illinois and Vermont — have non-binding goals on using renewable energy sources.
More states are forcing utilities toward wind, solar and other renewable energy sources, such as geothermal and biomass, to cut the use of coal and natural gas and spur greater U.S. energy independence. Burning coal produces greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide that contribute to climate change. Power plants fueled by natural gas pollute the air with sulfur dioxide.
Opponents, including some utilities and industries, say the switch will be costly for consumers and businesses. In Senate testimony last year, the National Association of Manufacturers opposed a proposed federal requirement to use renewable energy because it would reduce the flexibility of utilities in choosing fuels and harm businesses trying to remain competitive by containing costs.
Other states taking action:
- California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed a law in September that accelerates the timetable for 20% of electricity to come from solar, wind and other clean power sources. The compliance date is now 2010, seven years earlier than previously required by state law.
- New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson proposed last month that the state increase its current requirement that 10% of electricity come from renewable sources by 2011. He wants utilities to produce 15% of their power from renewable sources by 2015 and 25% by 2020.
- Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski is developing a legislative package calling for 25% of electrical power from renewable energy by 2025.
"We're going to move aggressively" on increasing the use of solar and wind power, says state House Speaker Andrew Romanoff. "Colorado ought to be a leader in this field, and it's been lapped by more aggressive states."
Colorado voters in 2004 approved a referendum requiring that the state draw 10% of its electricity from renewable sources. In October, the state's largest utility, Xcel Energy, announced it will meet the 10% target by next year. Xcel's quick success reflects, in part, the abundance of solar power and wind in Colorado, which is not the case everywhere.
Xcel, which serves 1.3 million customers in Colorado, is studying how it could attain a higher percentage, spokesman Tom Henley says. That's "something we're looking at. ... The only question is whether it would be prudent." He points to the intermittent reliability of wind and solar power.
Xcel was moving toward large-scale purchases of renewable electricity before the 2004 vote, Henley says. It has contracts with four large wind-electricity producers, is awaiting regulatory approval to build a large solar plant in southern Colorado and pays credits and rebates to homeowners and businesses that install solar panels.
Progress in the states could spur Congress to enact a federal standard, predicts Anna Aurelio, director of the Washington office of U.S. PIRG, a national environmental group. The Senate in 2005 approved a 10% mandate that failed in the House, and Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., incoming chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has said he will try again.
"This is a huge opportunity right now," Aurelio says.
Caldicott blasts nuclear report
North Side Courier
Wednesday 29/11/2006, Page: 5
Australia's pre-eminent anti-nuclear campaigner Dr Helen Caldicott last week delivered a blistering attack on nuclear power at a Mosman Rotary Club lunch at Taronga Zoo.
Coming just hours after the release of the Switkowski report, which gave a green light to Australia's nuclear power and uranium industries, Dr Caldicott slammed the "scientifically illiterate politicians" leading the charge towards a nuclear future.
"I testified before that committee and it was clear that those gentlemen had already made up their minds," Dr Caldicott, a former Nobel Peace Prize nominee and the inaugural winner of the Australian Peace Prize said.
Dr Caldicott has written several books on the perils of nuclear energy, and her speech at Taronga drew heavily from her latest offering, Nuclear Power is Not the Answer.
In her discussion about the dangers of global warming and radioactive waste, Dr Caldicott was scathing of those selling nuclear power as a "clean, green" alternative. "The Switkowski report is a Trojan horse," Dr Caldicott said.
"It's for Howard to open up the whole country for uranium mining and bring America's nuclear waste back here" In his report on the viability of Australian nuclear power, former Telstra Chief Ziggy Switkowski envisioned 25 nuclear reactors generating a third of Australia's electricity by 2050.
"Our observation of modern nuclear reactors is that they are very impressive bits of technology, very safe, arguably safer than alternatives," Mr Switkowski said when interviewed on Channel Nine.
These conclusions fly in the face of Dr Caldicott's assessment of nuclear energy, which she insists creates not only grave environmental risks, but security liabilities as well. "To be promoting nuclear power in the age of terrorism is sheer lunacy," she said.
Dr Caldicott argues that, given Australia is in possession of 40 per cent of the world's uranium, it is in a unique position to "stop the nuclear industry in its tracks." "We should have a solar panel on every house and wind farms all over the country," Dr Caldicott said.
Wednesday 29/11/2006, Page: 5
Australia's pre-eminent anti-nuclear campaigner Dr Helen Caldicott last week delivered a blistering attack on nuclear power at a Mosman Rotary Club lunch at Taronga Zoo.
Coming just hours after the release of the Switkowski report, which gave a green light to Australia's nuclear power and uranium industries, Dr Caldicott slammed the "scientifically illiterate politicians" leading the charge towards a nuclear future.
"I testified before that committee and it was clear that those gentlemen had already made up their minds," Dr Caldicott, a former Nobel Peace Prize nominee and the inaugural winner of the Australian Peace Prize said.
Dr Caldicott has written several books on the perils of nuclear energy, and her speech at Taronga drew heavily from her latest offering, Nuclear Power is Not the Answer.
In her discussion about the dangers of global warming and radioactive waste, Dr Caldicott was scathing of those selling nuclear power as a "clean, green" alternative. "The Switkowski report is a Trojan horse," Dr Caldicott said.
"It's for Howard to open up the whole country for uranium mining and bring America's nuclear waste back here" In his report on the viability of Australian nuclear power, former Telstra Chief Ziggy Switkowski envisioned 25 nuclear reactors generating a third of Australia's electricity by 2050.
"Our observation of modern nuclear reactors is that they are very impressive bits of technology, very safe, arguably safer than alternatives," Mr Switkowski said when interviewed on Channel Nine.
These conclusions fly in the face of Dr Caldicott's assessment of nuclear energy, which she insists creates not only grave environmental risks, but security liabilities as well. "To be promoting nuclear power in the age of terrorism is sheer lunacy," she said.
Dr Caldicott argues that, given Australia is in possession of 40 per cent of the world's uranium, it is in a unique position to "stop the nuclear industry in its tracks." "We should have a solar panel on every house and wind farms all over the country," Dr Caldicott said.
Spaniards' $29b tilt at windmills
Sydney Morning Herald
Thursday 30/11/2006 Page: 26
MADRID: Spanish power company Iberdrola has agreed to buy ScottishPower for $US22.5 billion ($28.9 billion), a move that would create one of Europe's largest utilities.
The board of ScottishPower said on Tuesday it would approve the bid, which would amount to 777p a share, slightly more than half of that in cash.
Iberdrola is Spain's second largest power company, behind Endesa, and one of the world's leading producers of wind power.
The deal with ScottishPower would enable it to increase its wind power capacity by as much as 50 per cent, analysts said, and to broaden its access not only to the British market but also to the American one, where it has been looking to expand.
Spanish companies, buoyed by a robust economic expansion that has lasted more than a decade, have been aggressively looking abroad for investment opportunities in recent years, particularly in Latin America and, more recently, in Britain.
The deal would allow Iberdrola to lower costs and to diversify beyond the Spanish market, where opportunities for growth are increasingly limited. "Together we will be able to guarantee immediate synergies and to access future economies of scale," Ignacio Galan, the chief executive of Iberdrola, said in a statement.
"The resulting group will be very well positioned for the future European energy market and will have a strong platform for growth, especially in renewable energies, a market in which it will be world leader." Iberdrola, which is based in Bilbao, in northern Spain, has operations in 28 countries and had $US15.3 billion in sales last year. The combined company would be worth $US84 billion, the companies said.
ScottishPower, based in Glasgow, has been considered a takeover target for more than 18 months, after a foray into the US failed to generate the expected revenue.
There has been heavy activity recently in Spain's energy market, with E.On of Germany and Gas Natural of Spain vying for Endesa. This led analysts to speculate that Iberdrola saw itself as a possible takeover target.
"This deal is away for the company's directors to protect themselves from takeovers from abroad and within Spain," said Jordi Padilla, the director of equities at Atlas Capital in Madrid.
Over the longer term, Mr Padilla said, the deal could allow Iberdrola to eventually make a move for a Spanish energy company, such as Gas Natural, without having to subject itself to Spanish regulations, which would probably require it to sell assets to avert monopoly concerns.
By joining with ScottishPower, he said,"a large part of its business would be outside of Spain, so regulatory authority could lie with the European Union rather than Spain if it decides to make a move for a Spanish company".
"Iberdrola is offering what we considered a high price for ScottishPower," Citigroup said in a note. "We estimate a slightly negative impact in our Iberdrola evaluation, although we consider that the company's medium/long-term fundamentals could improve, particularly in the wind power business." The deal, which Iberdrola said should be completed in April, is subject to approval from European regulators and shareholders of both companies.
Thursday 30/11/2006 Page: 26
MADRID: Spanish power company Iberdrola has agreed to buy ScottishPower for $US22.5 billion ($28.9 billion), a move that would create one of Europe's largest utilities.
The board of ScottishPower said on Tuesday it would approve the bid, which would amount to 777p a share, slightly more than half of that in cash.
Iberdrola is Spain's second largest power company, behind Endesa, and one of the world's leading producers of wind power.
The deal with ScottishPower would enable it to increase its wind power capacity by as much as 50 per cent, analysts said, and to broaden its access not only to the British market but also to the American one, where it has been looking to expand.
Spanish companies, buoyed by a robust economic expansion that has lasted more than a decade, have been aggressively looking abroad for investment opportunities in recent years, particularly in Latin America and, more recently, in Britain.
The deal would allow Iberdrola to lower costs and to diversify beyond the Spanish market, where opportunities for growth are increasingly limited. "Together we will be able to guarantee immediate synergies and to access future economies of scale," Ignacio Galan, the chief executive of Iberdrola, said in a statement.
"The resulting group will be very well positioned for the future European energy market and will have a strong platform for growth, especially in renewable energies, a market in which it will be world leader." Iberdrola, which is based in Bilbao, in northern Spain, has operations in 28 countries and had $US15.3 billion in sales last year. The combined company would be worth $US84 billion, the companies said.
ScottishPower, based in Glasgow, has been considered a takeover target for more than 18 months, after a foray into the US failed to generate the expected revenue.
There has been heavy activity recently in Spain's energy market, with E.On of Germany and Gas Natural of Spain vying for Endesa. This led analysts to speculate that Iberdrola saw itself as a possible takeover target.
"This deal is away for the company's directors to protect themselves from takeovers from abroad and within Spain," said Jordi Padilla, the director of equities at Atlas Capital in Madrid.
Over the longer term, Mr Padilla said, the deal could allow Iberdrola to eventually make a move for a Spanish energy company, such as Gas Natural, without having to subject itself to Spanish regulations, which would probably require it to sell assets to avert monopoly concerns.
By joining with ScottishPower, he said,"a large part of its business would be outside of Spain, so regulatory authority could lie with the European Union rather than Spain if it decides to make a move for a Spanish company".
"Iberdrola is offering what we considered a high price for ScottishPower," Citigroup said in a note. "We estimate a slightly negative impact in our Iberdrola evaluation, although we consider that the company's medium/long-term fundamentals could improve, particularly in the wind power business." The deal, which Iberdrola said should be completed in April, is subject to approval from European regulators and shareholders of both companies.
Desalination plant delivers
Business Review Weekly
Thursday 30/11/2006 Page: 9
The $387 million desalination plant at Kwinana, south of Perth, is delivering drinking water to Perth after the project was completed on time and within budget.
The plant, developed in a joint venture between Multiplex Group and French company Degremont for the Water Corporation of Western Australia, is the largest of its kind in the southern hemisphere and the third-largest in the world.
It is the first big sea water reverse-osmosis plant to be delivered in Australia and will produce 45 gigalitres of water a year - about 130 million litres a day
- and provide 17 per cent of Perth's water needs.
Electricity for the plant is being sourced from the Emu Downs Wind Farm, which was commissioned in October.
Thursday 30/11/2006 Page: 9
The $387 million desalination plant at Kwinana, south of Perth, is delivering drinking water to Perth after the project was completed on time and within budget.
The plant, developed in a joint venture between Multiplex Group and French company Degremont for the Water Corporation of Western Australia, is the largest of its kind in the southern hemisphere and the third-largest in the world.
It is the first big sea water reverse-osmosis plant to be delivered in Australia and will produce 45 gigalitres of water a year - about 130 million litres a day
- and provide 17 per cent of Perth's water needs.
Electricity for the plant is being sourced from the Emu Downs Wind Farm, which was commissioned in October.
Is solar an alternative to going nuclear?
Inner Western Suburbs Courier
Tuesday 28/11/2006, Page: 32
Incentives key to solving the power predicament, Dave Berick writes.
The sun is shining on Balmain resident Cornelius Van Der Weyden. Three months ago, Mr Van Der Weyden installed 18 photovoltaic panels on his roof. "We decided we could afford it and we wanted to do something for our children and grandchildren," he said.
Mr Van Der Weyden expects the panels, which convert sunlight into electricity, to halve his dependence on power coming from the main grid. Not only that, Mr Van Der Weyden's roof has become a mini power station. Each day, any surplus power is sold back to the electricity providers. Last quarter, he received $73 return on his electricity bill.
But the real winner is the environment. The panels, if you factor in their 30-year lifespan, stop the equivalent of 130 tonnes of greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere. Climate change has become a big issue in Australia, fuelled by images of the current drought and apocalyptic warnings from economists, scientists and film-makers.
The question is then, why aren't more Australians taking up solar? The answer is in the bottom line: solar remains incredibly expensive to set up. It cost Mr Van Der Weyden, even with the $4000 rebate from the Federal Government, $24,000 to install his system.
Markus Lambert from Conergy, a renewable energy company, said the problem was the poor price energy companies paid solar owners for the electricity they funnel back into the grid. Currently, solar homeowners are paid 12 cents per kilowatt hour, the same price that comes from conventional power plants. Most households use this money to pay for their systems, but because of its undervaluation, it can take upwards of 30 years to get a return on their investment, Mr Lambert said.
"There's no incentive for people to put solar on their roof," he said. "It's just too expensive." To make solar more attractive, Australia needed a "feed-in tariff", the concept powering Germany's remarkable growth in renewable energy, he said.
Called the EEG law, the tariff was imposed by the German Government on all electricity consumers (industry is exempted), guaranteeing and rewarding homes with a high price (45 cents per kilowatt hour) for their solar energy. Power companies, forced to buy renewable energy at elevated costs, shift the costs back onto ordinary consumers, who, in turn, are encouraged to put in their own renewable systems, creating more jobs and power.
Since it was brought in, the EEG law has revolutionised how Germany meets its energy needs. Currently, wind, solar and biomass account for 10 per cent of Germany's power, and this is expected to grow to 20-25 per cent as nuclear power is phased out over the next decade.
In Australia, the Federal Government is currently deciding how it will secure the country's future energy production, while reducing carbon emissions. Recently, solar has come back on the Government's radar. In May, the rebate for solar panels was extended to 2007, and in October, the Government committed $75 million to build a huge solar factory in rural Victoria.
And the rollout hasn't stopped there. This month the Government, in conjunction with BP Solar and Integral Energy, unveiled a $15 million investment to convert Blacktown into a solar city.
But the Government has made it clear Australia's future base power will be met by exploiting cleaner fossil fuels, not renewable energy. Speaking at the Solar City launch in Blacktown, the Prime Minister, John Howard, said: "If you want to produce base-load power, the cheapest and most immediate way of doing it is of course to use existing coal, and in some cases gas.
"Now solar and wind power have a significant role, but on all the advice I have, solar power can't replace power stations, it can't provide base load power generation. It can provide peak power, it can provide an augmentation, and a very significant one to the contribution made by coal fired power stations, so it will have a role. But I believe very strongly that if we are serious about this issue, we have to look at the nuclear option".
Last week a taskforce appointed by the Federal Government recommended nuclear as a "green" energy option - even though the 25 plants won't come online until at least 2020. Ultimately, the Government is pinning its hopes on developing clean-coal technology, such as carbon capture and storage, and efficient brown coal drying plants, like the pilot project under way at Hazlewood in Victoria.
And as this technology is more expensive, the cheapness of coal will be eroded, making nuclear much more financially competitive.
But former chair of the Australian and New Zealand Solar Energy Society, Mahalath Halperin said the Government was paying lip service to solar power. "As they say, you can't spell Coalition without coal;" she said. "It's obvious that a feed-in tariff would create a viable, workable solar industry; all it takes a bit of political will power.
Unfortunately our Government listens to a very strong fossil fuel lobby group."
Tuesday 28/11/2006, Page: 32
Incentives key to solving the power predicament, Dave Berick writes.
The sun is shining on Balmain resident Cornelius Van Der Weyden. Three months ago, Mr Van Der Weyden installed 18 photovoltaic panels on his roof. "We decided we could afford it and we wanted to do something for our children and grandchildren," he said.
Mr Van Der Weyden expects the panels, which convert sunlight into electricity, to halve his dependence on power coming from the main grid. Not only that, Mr Van Der Weyden's roof has become a mini power station. Each day, any surplus power is sold back to the electricity providers. Last quarter, he received $73 return on his electricity bill.
But the real winner is the environment. The panels, if you factor in their 30-year lifespan, stop the equivalent of 130 tonnes of greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere. Climate change has become a big issue in Australia, fuelled by images of the current drought and apocalyptic warnings from economists, scientists and film-makers.
The question is then, why aren't more Australians taking up solar? The answer is in the bottom line: solar remains incredibly expensive to set up. It cost Mr Van Der Weyden, even with the $4000 rebate from the Federal Government, $24,000 to install his system.
Markus Lambert from Conergy, a renewable energy company, said the problem was the poor price energy companies paid solar owners for the electricity they funnel back into the grid. Currently, solar homeowners are paid 12 cents per kilowatt hour, the same price that comes from conventional power plants. Most households use this money to pay for their systems, but because of its undervaluation, it can take upwards of 30 years to get a return on their investment, Mr Lambert said.
"There's no incentive for people to put solar on their roof," he said. "It's just too expensive." To make solar more attractive, Australia needed a "feed-in tariff", the concept powering Germany's remarkable growth in renewable energy, he said.
Called the EEG law, the tariff was imposed by the German Government on all electricity consumers (industry is exempted), guaranteeing and rewarding homes with a high price (45 cents per kilowatt hour) for their solar energy. Power companies, forced to buy renewable energy at elevated costs, shift the costs back onto ordinary consumers, who, in turn, are encouraged to put in their own renewable systems, creating more jobs and power.
Since it was brought in, the EEG law has revolutionised how Germany meets its energy needs. Currently, wind, solar and biomass account for 10 per cent of Germany's power, and this is expected to grow to 20-25 per cent as nuclear power is phased out over the next decade.
In Australia, the Federal Government is currently deciding how it will secure the country's future energy production, while reducing carbon emissions. Recently, solar has come back on the Government's radar. In May, the rebate for solar panels was extended to 2007, and in October, the Government committed $75 million to build a huge solar factory in rural Victoria.
And the rollout hasn't stopped there. This month the Government, in conjunction with BP Solar and Integral Energy, unveiled a $15 million investment to convert Blacktown into a solar city.
But the Government has made it clear Australia's future base power will be met by exploiting cleaner fossil fuels, not renewable energy. Speaking at the Solar City launch in Blacktown, the Prime Minister, John Howard, said: "If you want to produce base-load power, the cheapest and most immediate way of doing it is of course to use existing coal, and in some cases gas.
"Now solar and wind power have a significant role, but on all the advice I have, solar power can't replace power stations, it can't provide base load power generation. It can provide peak power, it can provide an augmentation, and a very significant one to the contribution made by coal fired power stations, so it will have a role. But I believe very strongly that if we are serious about this issue, we have to look at the nuclear option".
Last week a taskforce appointed by the Federal Government recommended nuclear as a "green" energy option - even though the 25 plants won't come online until at least 2020. Ultimately, the Government is pinning its hopes on developing clean-coal technology, such as carbon capture and storage, and efficient brown coal drying plants, like the pilot project under way at Hazlewood in Victoria.
And as this technology is more expensive, the cheapness of coal will be eroded, making nuclear much more financially competitive.
But former chair of the Australian and New Zealand Solar Energy Society, Mahalath Halperin said the Government was paying lip service to solar power. "As they say, you can't spell Coalition without coal;" she said. "It's obvious that a feed-in tariff would create a viable, workable solar industry; all it takes a bit of political will power.
Unfortunately our Government listens to a very strong fossil fuel lobby group."
"Devon North suitable for turbines" - says Terry
Yarram Standard News
Wednesday 22/11/2006, Page: 5
WIND turbines should be erected on the site proposed for the Devon North wind farm as the property is zoned rural, according to renewable energy supporter, Terry Willmott.
And the Devon North resident believes objecting neighbours have no case against the wind farm as many of their properties are also zoned rural.
"It astounds me given that these people bought properties in a rural zone. What else do they expect?" Mr Willmott said. "These people are not full time farmers but they live in a rural zone. The only property out there used for rural activities is the site proposed for the wind farm.
"The other people out there bought properties for a country lifestyle in a rural zone. The council should not have allowed them to do so" Mr Willmott said rural zonings are comparable to industrial zonings in a metropolitan area: 'They would have no rights to object to a factory being built next door to them in an industrial zone in a metropolitan area.
"Many of the houses in question are old farm houses but they're not zoned rural residential. They're zoned rural. I don't know how the shire has allowed things to get where they are" Wellington Shire Council's director of community and development, Steve Dickson, confirmed most objectors to the wind farm lived on land zoned rural.
"People are saying that wind farms would detract from their rural lifestyle. At the end of the day, people living in a rural zone have a right to raise a matter that affects them;' he said.
"But that does not mean that someone else has no rights." Mr Dickson said he did not believe objectors' properties should have been re-zoned to rural residential. "At Devon North, some areas are targeted to be changed to rural residential under council's residential and rural residential review.
"Under State Government changes that are now in place, a lot of rural land will be changed to a new farming zone to discourage people from living in farming areas if they are hobby farmers, and instead live in a rural living zone" Mr Dickson said that zoning would cater for people wishing to live on a small parcel of land without impacting on farming activities.
People living on lot sizes under 40ha must now prove to council they are farming on the property. Mr Willmott said people relocating to properties zoned rural should expect land uses such as wind farms to be proposed for such locations. 'What if pine trees were put on this property instead of the wind farm?" he said.
Wellington councillors overturned planning officers' recommendation to approve the wind farm. The company proposing the wind farm has now taken council's objection to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).
Mr Dickson said council expects to receive a date for the VCAT hearing by Christmas. Mr Willmott said councillors should have followed planners' advice.
"Once again we have the council paying the wages of these professional planning people to advise the councillors on this, but the councillors do not have expertise in these matters and still they ignore the planners;' he said.
Mr Willmott said council had set a precedent for hobby farmers' views to take priority over proposals by neighbouring full-time farmers.
He also queried tactics adopted by wind farm opponents. "One minute these people are saying their views would be obstructed and the next they're saying a bit of compensation would help;' Mr Willmott said. "They say how useless wind farms are but now they're saying they're all for wind farms but not in a residential area. They keep changing their arguments.
"If the 20 objectors want these lovely rolling hills to be maintained as they are, then why don't they form a co-operative and give the money to the people who own the wind farm site, to have it maintained in the manner in which they want it maintained"
Wednesday 22/11/2006, Page: 5
WIND turbines should be erected on the site proposed for the Devon North wind farm as the property is zoned rural, according to renewable energy supporter, Terry Willmott.
And the Devon North resident believes objecting neighbours have no case against the wind farm as many of their properties are also zoned rural.
"It astounds me given that these people bought properties in a rural zone. What else do they expect?" Mr Willmott said. "These people are not full time farmers but they live in a rural zone. The only property out there used for rural activities is the site proposed for the wind farm.
"The other people out there bought properties for a country lifestyle in a rural zone. The council should not have allowed them to do so" Mr Willmott said rural zonings are comparable to industrial zonings in a metropolitan area: 'They would have no rights to object to a factory being built next door to them in an industrial zone in a metropolitan area.
"Many of the houses in question are old farm houses but they're not zoned rural residential. They're zoned rural. I don't know how the shire has allowed things to get where they are" Wellington Shire Council's director of community and development, Steve Dickson, confirmed most objectors to the wind farm lived on land zoned rural.
"People are saying that wind farms would detract from their rural lifestyle. At the end of the day, people living in a rural zone have a right to raise a matter that affects them;' he said.
"But that does not mean that someone else has no rights." Mr Dickson said he did not believe objectors' properties should have been re-zoned to rural residential. "At Devon North, some areas are targeted to be changed to rural residential under council's residential and rural residential review.
"Under State Government changes that are now in place, a lot of rural land will be changed to a new farming zone to discourage people from living in farming areas if they are hobby farmers, and instead live in a rural living zone" Mr Dickson said that zoning would cater for people wishing to live on a small parcel of land without impacting on farming activities.
People living on lot sizes under 40ha must now prove to council they are farming on the property. Mr Willmott said people relocating to properties zoned rural should expect land uses such as wind farms to be proposed for such locations. 'What if pine trees were put on this property instead of the wind farm?" he said.
Wellington councillors overturned planning officers' recommendation to approve the wind farm. The company proposing the wind farm has now taken council's objection to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).
Mr Dickson said council expects to receive a date for the VCAT hearing by Christmas. Mr Willmott said councillors should have followed planners' advice.
"Once again we have the council paying the wages of these professional planning people to advise the councillors on this, but the councillors do not have expertise in these matters and still they ignore the planners;' he said.
Mr Willmott said council had set a precedent for hobby farmers' views to take priority over proposals by neighbouring full-time farmers.
He also queried tactics adopted by wind farm opponents. "One minute these people are saying their views would be obstructed and the next they're saying a bit of compensation would help;' Mr Willmott said. "They say how useless wind farms are but now they're saying they're all for wind farms but not in a residential area. They keep changing their arguments.
"If the 20 objectors want these lovely rolling hills to be maintained as they are, then why don't they form a co-operative and give the money to the people who own the wind farm site, to have it maintained in the manner in which they want it maintained"
Tuesday, 28 November 2006
Further "hot rocks" exploration
South Eastern Times
Thursday 23/11/2006 Page: 3
INVESTIGATIONS are about to get underway to determine the geothermal potential for so-called "hot rocks" in the Furner district. Geothermal Resources Limited has been granted two geothermal exploration licences in the Otway Basin, taking in almost 1,000 square kilometres of the region.
They expire on October 31, 2011, and exclude the Furner Conservation Park and the Reedy Creek Conservation Park. The licences were recently issued by Dr Barry Goldstein and came into effect on November 1.
Dr Goldstein is the State Government's Director of Petroleum Minerals and Energy Resources and was acting under the authority of Mineral Resources Development Minister Paul Holloway.
It is thought there could be sufficient heat from volcanic eruptions 4,000 years ago in the region to warm water to drive turbines. The "green" electricity generated by such turbines would then be channelled into the national grid. The district is already a major energy hub, thanks to the two wind farms along the Woakwine Range, a peak gas-fired turbine generating plant at Snuggery and the Katnook natural gas plant.
Last November, Sydney-based company Scopenergy was granted a geo-thermal licence for 142 square kilometres in the Lower South East. Scopenergy executives have announced they intend to drill numerous test holes at Mt Burr to determine the extent of the "hot rocks".
If matters go to plan, a small power generation plant could be built at Mt Burr.
Thursday 23/11/2006 Page: 3
INVESTIGATIONS are about to get underway to determine the geothermal potential for so-called "hot rocks" in the Furner district. Geothermal Resources Limited has been granted two geothermal exploration licences in the Otway Basin, taking in almost 1,000 square kilometres of the region.
They expire on October 31, 2011, and exclude the Furner Conservation Park and the Reedy Creek Conservation Park. The licences were recently issued by Dr Barry Goldstein and came into effect on November 1.
Dr Goldstein is the State Government's Director of Petroleum Minerals and Energy Resources and was acting under the authority of Mineral Resources Development Minister Paul Holloway.
It is thought there could be sufficient heat from volcanic eruptions 4,000 years ago in the region to warm water to drive turbines. The "green" electricity generated by such turbines would then be channelled into the national grid. The district is already a major energy hub, thanks to the two wind farms along the Woakwine Range, a peak gas-fired turbine generating plant at Snuggery and the Katnook natural gas plant.
Last November, Sydney-based company Scopenergy was granted a geo-thermal licence for 142 square kilometres in the Lower South East. Scopenergy executives have announced they intend to drill numerous test holes at Mt Burr to determine the extent of the "hot rocks".
If matters go to plan, a small power generation plant could be built at Mt Burr.
Wind farms are the future
Portland Observer
Friday 24/11/2006, Page: 13
ONE Portland company expects to increase its direct workforce by nearly 300 per cent when work on the Cape Bridgewater wind farm starts in the near future.
G.R. Carr Pty Ltd managing director Peter Carr told the wind energy forum hosted by People Power South West Coast candidate Mike Noske on Tuesday night of' the employment and expansion opportunities associated with wind farms in the region.
He said that while contracts were yet to be finalised, his firm was looking to employ an additional 30 to 40 workers once work on the wind farm started - up from the current 22 workers. The company is hoping to work on the concrete foundations for the wind towers.
Mr Noske reaffirmed his position of supporting the VRET based on job opportunities and economic benefits to Portland, and also for environmental reasons.
National Party candidate David O'Brien also attended the forum and differentiated his party's policy on VRET and wind farms from the Liberal Party which would abolish VRET. Mr O'Brien said The Nationals supported VRET, albeit with a bit of fine tuning.
"I also believe a form of compensation or royalties should be paid to adjoining landholders, perhaps on a diminishing scale according to distance from turbines," he said.
AusWind president Andrew Richards rejected the notion of paying royalties to adjoining landholders, saying there was a code in place regarding community consultation. Mr Richards also referred to the community fund Pacific Hydro would establish once the PWEP was finalised, saying that fund would spread the benefits across the community.
Friday 24/11/2006, Page: 13
ONE Portland company expects to increase its direct workforce by nearly 300 per cent when work on the Cape Bridgewater wind farm starts in the near future.
G.R. Carr Pty Ltd managing director Peter Carr told the wind energy forum hosted by People Power South West Coast candidate Mike Noske on Tuesday night of' the employment and expansion opportunities associated with wind farms in the region.
He said that while contracts were yet to be finalised, his firm was looking to employ an additional 30 to 40 workers once work on the wind farm started - up from the current 22 workers. The company is hoping to work on the concrete foundations for the wind towers.
Mr Noske reaffirmed his position of supporting the VRET based on job opportunities and economic benefits to Portland, and also for environmental reasons.
National Party candidate David O'Brien also attended the forum and differentiated his party's policy on VRET and wind farms from the Liberal Party which would abolish VRET. Mr O'Brien said The Nationals supported VRET, albeit with a bit of fine tuning.
"I also believe a form of compensation or royalties should be paid to adjoining landholders, perhaps on a diminishing scale according to distance from turbines," he said.
AusWind president Andrew Richards rejected the notion of paying royalties to adjoining landholders, saying there was a code in place regarding community consultation. Mr Richards also referred to the community fund Pacific Hydro would establish once the PWEP was finalised, saying that fund would spread the benefits across the community.
The threat of climate change
Waste Management & Environment
November, 2006 Page: 17
Australia is not known as the sunburnt country for nothing. Climate change will dry us out completely if we don't take systematic action. Climate change and water are the two sides of the same coin, and Australia desperately needs a strategy for both. Increasing temperatures and water shortages mean the harsh reality of climate change is here.
Everyone knows it's happening and that the science about climate change is right. Carbon pollution is making the greenhouse blanket around the Earth way too thick, trapping heat and distorting our climate and drying up our water supplies. The 10 hottest years ever have occurred in the past 14, and 2005 was the hottest year on record. The Murray River is at its lowest level for over 100 years.
Saying the drought is linked to climate change is as obvious as linking speeding to car accidents. If we don't take action, we are headed for an economic and environmental crash. For example, the 2006 grain harvest was cut by 36 per cent due to reduced rainfall and ongoing drought, cutting Australia's export income by $2 billion.
The Stern Report has focused the world's attention on the potentially dire economic impacts of climate change. It has reported that taking action to avoid dangerous climate change will be significantly less costly than the cost of inaction.
Taking action is an environmental and economic imperative for Australia.
The report is a sharp repudiation of the climate change sceptics in the Howard Government who are frozen in time while the globe ,varms around them. According to the report, climate change could cost the global economy more than both World Wars and the Great Depression combined. Unless the world begins to act now to reduce the level of carbon in the atmosphere, global economic output could be cut by up to 20 per cent.
Time to harness our natural advantages
While greenhouse emissions are causing the problem, Australia's natural advantage with solar and wind energy places us well to exploit clean renewable energy.
The Howard Government has rejected expanding its renewable energy target, yet Solar Systems' project in Mallee, Victoria was only possible because the Victorian Labor Government adopted such a target. The Victorian target of 10 per cent power from renewables by 2016 made the project viable, but the Howard Government has rejected expanding the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) beyond its pathetic two per cent.
Renewable energy projects are going ahead in Australia despite, not because of, Howard Government policies. In fact, Australia is the only country where renewable energy projects are being closed.
While Labor welcomes one-off announcements, what we need is a systematic response to climate change. Australia needs to significantly increase its renewable energy target and develop economic incentives to encourage long-term investment in renewables and clean coal technology.
We need decisive national leadership to ensure we get a decent share of a global market in renewables, estimated to grow into a trillion dollar industry in coming years. The recent renewables manufacturing plant closed by Vestas Nacelle in Tasmania cost 100 jobs, and Roaring 40s' decision not to proceed with two renewable energy projects cost regional Australia $550 million and 200 full-time construction jobs. Both companies said it was because of a lack of Federal Government support.
Under the Kyoto Protocol, additional investment in clean and renewable energy projects in developing countries, such as China, will be $133 billion by 2012. Currently, the only way Australian companies can access investment under Kyoto is by setting up offices in countries that have ratified Kyoto, such as Fiji or New Zealand, or by being minority joint venture partners. This is shameful.
The business sector needs clear targets that encourage investment certainty for the transformation to a carbon constrained economy. Only with a comprehensive plan will we he able to take up opportunities that are available, whilst avoiding dangerous climate change.
Pricing of our natural resources is one of the most pressing reform agendas facing Australia, and no more so than in the case of climate change. Labor supports not only the development of renewables, clean coal and other low emission technologies, but also the market mechanisms to ensure their widespread deployment to drive greenhouse emission reductions. The push of technology combined with the pull of the market.
Projects such as Solar Systems' highlight the fact that clean technology is available right now. The real challenge is to ensure the technology is commercialised and widely applied, and not just a one-off announcement
November, 2006 Page: 17
Australia is not known as the sunburnt country for nothing. Climate change will dry us out completely if we don't take systematic action. Climate change and water are the two sides of the same coin, and Australia desperately needs a strategy for both. Increasing temperatures and water shortages mean the harsh reality of climate change is here.
Everyone knows it's happening and that the science about climate change is right. Carbon pollution is making the greenhouse blanket around the Earth way too thick, trapping heat and distorting our climate and drying up our water supplies. The 10 hottest years ever have occurred in the past 14, and 2005 was the hottest year on record. The Murray River is at its lowest level for over 100 years.
Saying the drought is linked to climate change is as obvious as linking speeding to car accidents. If we don't take action, we are headed for an economic and environmental crash. For example, the 2006 grain harvest was cut by 36 per cent due to reduced rainfall and ongoing drought, cutting Australia's export income by $2 billion.
The Stern Report has focused the world's attention on the potentially dire economic impacts of climate change. It has reported that taking action to avoid dangerous climate change will be significantly less costly than the cost of inaction.
Taking action is an environmental and economic imperative for Australia.
The report is a sharp repudiation of the climate change sceptics in the Howard Government who are frozen in time while the globe ,varms around them. According to the report, climate change could cost the global economy more than both World Wars and the Great Depression combined. Unless the world begins to act now to reduce the level of carbon in the atmosphere, global economic output could be cut by up to 20 per cent.
Time to harness our natural advantages
While greenhouse emissions are causing the problem, Australia's natural advantage with solar and wind energy places us well to exploit clean renewable energy.
The Howard Government has rejected expanding its renewable energy target, yet Solar Systems' project in Mallee, Victoria was only possible because the Victorian Labor Government adopted such a target. The Victorian target of 10 per cent power from renewables by 2016 made the project viable, but the Howard Government has rejected expanding the Mandatory Renewable Energy Target (MRET) beyond its pathetic two per cent.
Renewable energy projects are going ahead in Australia despite, not because of, Howard Government policies. In fact, Australia is the only country where renewable energy projects are being closed.
While Labor welcomes one-off announcements, what we need is a systematic response to climate change. Australia needs to significantly increase its renewable energy target and develop economic incentives to encourage long-term investment in renewables and clean coal technology.
We need decisive national leadership to ensure we get a decent share of a global market in renewables, estimated to grow into a trillion dollar industry in coming years. The recent renewables manufacturing plant closed by Vestas Nacelle in Tasmania cost 100 jobs, and Roaring 40s' decision not to proceed with two renewable energy projects cost regional Australia $550 million and 200 full-time construction jobs. Both companies said it was because of a lack of Federal Government support.
Under the Kyoto Protocol, additional investment in clean and renewable energy projects in developing countries, such as China, will be $133 billion by 2012. Currently, the only way Australian companies can access investment under Kyoto is by setting up offices in countries that have ratified Kyoto, such as Fiji or New Zealand, or by being minority joint venture partners. This is shameful.
The business sector needs clear targets that encourage investment certainty for the transformation to a carbon constrained economy. Only with a comprehensive plan will we he able to take up opportunities that are available, whilst avoiding dangerous climate change.
Pricing of our natural resources is one of the most pressing reform agendas facing Australia, and no more so than in the case of climate change. Labor supports not only the development of renewables, clean coal and other low emission technologies, but also the market mechanisms to ensure their widespread deployment to drive greenhouse emission reductions. The push of technology combined with the pull of the market.
Projects such as Solar Systems' highlight the fact that clean technology is available right now. The real challenge is to ensure the technology is commercialised and widely applied, and not just a one-off announcement
New Year's resolution makes a difference
Sydney Morning Herald
Tuesday 28/11/2006 Page: 16
It was during the stifling heat of January 1 this year, when the mercury reached a staggering 42 degrees, that Bega's Dr Matthew Nott had an epiphany. He had gone to the beach to try to escape the oppressive heat and sat reading Tim Flannery's book The Weather Makers. It was then he realised thinking locally could actually make a big difference globally.
"He just got this idea and ran with it," says Nicholas Graham- Higgs, who has been involved with Nott and his Clean Energy For Eternity campaign since it began after that New Year's Day insight.
Within weeks, Nott had organised a community meeting of more than 3000 people to try to significantly reduce the region's greenhouse-gas footprint. Just weeks after that initial meeting he had rallied more than 3000 people to get together down at Tathra Beach to create a human sign that read Clean Energy For Eternity.
His charisma and passion for what he was doing was infectious and the Bega Valley Shire Council was soon on board, formulating a policy in conjunction with the group to introduce its 50/50 By 2020 project. The council plans to introduce 50 per cent renewable energy into its operations and reduce the amount of energy it uses by 50 per cent by 2020.
"The Bega Valley has a population of about 30,000 and Matt managed to get 10 per cent of those to come along to the beach, out of school holiday time, to make this human sign," Graham-Higgs says. "He organised everything, even buses to get people there. He then rode around on a quad bike getting everyone in position."
Nott's enthusiasm for what he was doing did not end there. In July the orthopaedic surgeon decided to take the message closer to the nation's capital, firstly making a splash by swimming across Lake Jindabyne on a day when the sleet was falling almost horizontally and with only a support boat by his side, then organising a rally in October to create another human sign on the grounds of Parliament House.
"He is incredibly dedicated and really does believe in this issue," Graham-Higgs says. "As a surgeon he doesn't have that much time, but he is out there doing all this as well. And he is a pretty humble sort of bloke. He knows that if Bega Valley Shire can do the 50/50 by 2020 it can be used as an example for other regions."
Tuesday 28/11/2006 Page: 16
It was during the stifling heat of January 1 this year, when the mercury reached a staggering 42 degrees, that Bega's Dr Matthew Nott had an epiphany. He had gone to the beach to try to escape the oppressive heat and sat reading Tim Flannery's book The Weather Makers. It was then he realised thinking locally could actually make a big difference globally.
"He just got this idea and ran with it," says Nicholas Graham- Higgs, who has been involved with Nott and his Clean Energy For Eternity campaign since it began after that New Year's Day insight.
Within weeks, Nott had organised a community meeting of more than 3000 people to try to significantly reduce the region's greenhouse-gas footprint. Just weeks after that initial meeting he had rallied more than 3000 people to get together down at Tathra Beach to create a human sign that read Clean Energy For Eternity.
His charisma and passion for what he was doing was infectious and the Bega Valley Shire Council was soon on board, formulating a policy in conjunction with the group to introduce its 50/50 By 2020 project. The council plans to introduce 50 per cent renewable energy into its operations and reduce the amount of energy it uses by 50 per cent by 2020.
"The Bega Valley has a population of about 30,000 and Matt managed to get 10 per cent of those to come along to the beach, out of school holiday time, to make this human sign," Graham-Higgs says. "He organised everything, even buses to get people there. He then rode around on a quad bike getting everyone in position."
Nott's enthusiasm for what he was doing did not end there. In July the orthopaedic surgeon decided to take the message closer to the nation's capital, firstly making a splash by swimming across Lake Jindabyne on a day when the sleet was falling almost horizontally and with only a support boat by his side, then organising a rally in October to create another human sign on the grounds of Parliament House.
"He is incredibly dedicated and really does believe in this issue," Graham-Higgs says. "As a surgeon he doesn't have that much time, but he is out there doing all this as well. And he is a pretty humble sort of bloke. He knows that if Bega Valley Shire can do the 50/50 by 2020 it can be used as an example for other regions."
AGL cleans up power market as renewable demand soars
Sydney Morning Herald
Tuesday 28/11/2006 Page: 16
Consumer demand has forced AGL's GreenPower scheme to grow by 88 per cent in the 12 months to June. The public's greater demand for cleaner power is forcing the gas and electricity provider to investigate more renewable-energy sources. In the past year, the company has pursued clean-energy initiatives to make it a leader in the field of green energy.
After a number of acquisitions, AGL now sources nearly 37 per cent of its generation capacity from renewable-energy sources which produce no greenhouse-gas emissions. Already more than 35,000 AGL customers have switched to accredited GreenPower.
"Generally most of the green power people buy comes from hydro-electricity schemes, wind farms and landfill-gas facilities," says AGL's manager of carbon and renewable strategy, Tim Nelson. "What we are seeing in the marketplace is an interest and an awareness of green power and its effect on climate change."
The power company is increasing its portfolio by buying a number of green-energy sources, including the 140-megawatt Bogong hydroelectric project in Victoria. The plant is set to be the largest of its kind to be built in Australia in the past 25 years. AGL has also invested in the 95-megawatt Hallet Wind Farm project in South Australia. Once again it is the biggest facility of its kind in the country.
"The company perspective is consistent to where we have been positioning ourselves in the market," Nelson says. "AGL is making some serious decisions about where we are sourcing our energy, which are all producing low emissions. "If you look at projects we are announcing to build, they are all renewable-energy sources. Of course it is a transitional process to move our customers to accredited Green Power but AGL has always been focused on the outcome." Nelson says the progressive nature of AGL's business strategy will mean significantly fewer greenhouse emissions.
And the education of consumers is a large part in trying to convert its energy users to accredited green power sources. As part of its retail product advertising, AGL is using considerable resources to promote renewable energy. Its Energy Matters campaign is a grassroots program to educate staff and customers on how energy efficiency can help improve the environment.
The company practises what it preaches by powering its offices with 100 per cent greenhouse neutral energy sources. It also offsets 20 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions from its fleet of vehicles.
Tuesday 28/11/2006 Page: 16
Consumer demand has forced AGL's GreenPower scheme to grow by 88 per cent in the 12 months to June. The public's greater demand for cleaner power is forcing the gas and electricity provider to investigate more renewable-energy sources. In the past year, the company has pursued clean-energy initiatives to make it a leader in the field of green energy.
After a number of acquisitions, AGL now sources nearly 37 per cent of its generation capacity from renewable-energy sources which produce no greenhouse-gas emissions. Already more than 35,000 AGL customers have switched to accredited GreenPower.
"Generally most of the green power people buy comes from hydro-electricity schemes, wind farms and landfill-gas facilities," says AGL's manager of carbon and renewable strategy, Tim Nelson. "What we are seeing in the marketplace is an interest and an awareness of green power and its effect on climate change."
The power company is increasing its portfolio by buying a number of green-energy sources, including the 140-megawatt Bogong hydroelectric project in Victoria. The plant is set to be the largest of its kind to be built in Australia in the past 25 years. AGL has also invested in the 95-megawatt Hallet Wind Farm project in South Australia. Once again it is the biggest facility of its kind in the country.
"The company perspective is consistent to where we have been positioning ourselves in the market," Nelson says. "AGL is making some serious decisions about where we are sourcing our energy, which are all producing low emissions. "If you look at projects we are announcing to build, they are all renewable-energy sources. Of course it is a transitional process to move our customers to accredited Green Power but AGL has always been focused on the outcome." Nelson says the progressive nature of AGL's business strategy will mean significantly fewer greenhouse emissions.
And the education of consumers is a large part in trying to convert its energy users to accredited green power sources. As part of its retail product advertising, AGL is using considerable resources to promote renewable energy. Its Energy Matters campaign is a grassroots program to educate staff and customers on how energy efficiency can help improve the environment.
The company practises what it preaches by powering its offices with 100 per cent greenhouse neutral energy sources. It also offsets 20 per cent of the greenhouse gas emissions from its fleet of vehicles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)